A metastructure in which even when one is wrong one is right.
Kant created a structure of truth (epistemology) out of aesthetic itself. This had wide-ranging ramifications for aesthetic, will, and ethics. This occurred even though Kant used the term "aesthetic" to refer to form which was technically incorrect (aesthetic is contrapositive to form).
Marx also created an epistemology but his epistemology cannot answer Kant's epistemology because Marx created a structure of truth from form (formalism).
A sardonic label for the academic meta-enterprise of endlessly theorizing about knowledge itself. It points to the potential for scholarship in philosophy and social studies of science to become a self-referential, jargon-laden system focused more on internal debates, career-building, and generating complex theories than on clarifying how we know things in the practical world.
*Example: Writing a 400-page treatise deploying Epistemology Industry jargon to deconstruct the "socio-technical imaginaries of evidence-production" in a field you've never actually worked in, all to secure tenure, while a farmer's practical, life-saving knowledge of climate patterns is ignored because it wasn't produced within the industry.*
Biases in how we study knowledge itself—the assumptions and preferences that shape epistemological inquiry. Epistemology Biases include: privileging Western epistemology over others; focusing on propositional knowledge over procedural, tacit, or experiential knowledge; assuming knowledge is individual rather than social; treating justification as more important than understanding; ignoring the role of power in knowledge production. Epistemology Biases shape what questions get asked, what answers count, and who gets to be an epistemologist.
Epistemology Biases "Your epistemology class only studied Descartes, Hume, and Kant. That's Epistemology Bias—assuming Western philosophy is epistemology, not one epistemology among many. Indigenous epistemologies? Ignored. Feminist epistemology? Optional. Eastern epistemology? Comparative philosophy. Epistemology bias makes the discipline smaller than the phenomenon it studies."
Second-order biases about epistemology itself—systematic distortions in how we study knowledge. Epistemology Metabiases include: assuming Western epistemology is epistemology, not one tradition; treating knowledge as individual rather than social; focusing on propositional knowledge while ignoring procedural, tacit, experiential; believing that epistemological questions are timeless rather than historical; ignoring the role of power in knowledge production. Epistemology Metabiases shape what questions get asked, what counts as an answer, and who gets to be an epistemologist.
Epistemology Metabiases "Your epistemology class only studied Descartes to Kant. That's Epistemology Metabias—treating Western philosophy as the whole story. Epistemology means study of knowledge, not study of European theories of knowledge. The metabias is thinking your tradition is the tradition, not one tradition among many."