A blustering, over-confident person, whose insistence that the INTERPRETIVE assumptions made since speculation about inferred-assumable doppler-shift like indications of the
age of the universe, is as
well proven, as other science, in-substantia of EXCLUSIARY standards, i.
e. this... cannot be ANYthing else,.. of which science demands before one can claim to know something absolutely,.. whose blow-ING ... or pushing,.. bible-bashing,..
etc ... makes them 'A' blowhole ... for either the specific theory,.. or irresponsible conduct /
sloppy science in general,
Whome is also, YET to have stopped,
future-tense verb... blowING.
It can be combined with source indirect references, also - see example
Prof ambiguousPratt over in astrophysics, is such a massive Big-
Bang Blowhole,.. i heard her going on about how that new grant is certain not to be a
waste for the uni,.. but get this,.. she avoided 4 times! while i was evesdropping on her making her telephone call, whether or not we would be getting much from it ... in other words, yes, but technically, if it leads to other improvements in other things,.. not necessarily the results being aimed for,.. for the experiment in question. Who'
s not heard of that one before? Oh yeah
maybe we'll
get something valuable as a by-product somewhere down the
line,.. i'm sure ... so nevermind whether or not ... MY ... experiment ... is going to be worth it for what's being aimed for just-within it. What a Big-
Bang Blowhole, gosh i'm sick of her, every time there's reasonable scrutiny into efficiency, she doesn't shut up for weeks, phone constantly going around the
corner, GOES OFF, for weeks on end, yeah i know, i know...
