An internet game where you come up with two random and unrelated terms. You then try to link the first term to the second through the links in definitions from www.wikipedia.com. No going backwards!
Pencil Sharpener to Chocolate
Pencil Sharpener --> School --> North America --> United States of America --> FDA --> Food --> Legumes --> Beans --> Cocoa Beans --> Chocolate
"Wikilink is intense"
Wikilink came from achamber
Pencil Sharpener --> School --> North America --> United States of America --> FDA --> Food --> Legumes --> Beans --> Cocoa Beans --> Chocolate
"Wikilink is intense"
Wikilink came from achamber
by Another Waldo December 12, 2004
Get the wikilink mug.Wiki demons are individuals that have decided to posess a given wiki page, and valiantly battle all attempts to change their edits to the page, regardless of how logical or intelligent the change may be.
The defining characteristic that sets wikidemons apart is the fact that their ego drives their interest in the pages they infest, rather than an actual concern for scolarly pursuits.
Like most generic demons, they liken themselves unto gods above the mere mortals that dare enter their self-proclaimed domain.
This does not mean they have any special or insightful knowledge of the page, but that they merely demand that all other beings must be inferior in their understanding of the posessed pages, as the wikidemon's ego can allow no peers to their self-imagined wisdom.
The wikidemons can be most easily spotted by their domination of article history as perpetually reverting any changes that dare go against their self-worshipped decision of what the page should be, and by their complete domination of an article's talk page, often to the point of responding not only to multiple other people who question their ultimate control of the page, but hapless passers by and even themselves.
There are, at this time, no known ways to truly combat, vanquish, slay, banish, or otherwise exorcise wikidemons from their adopted domains.
Until such a method is devised, wikis will forever remain unreliable sources, as any given wikidemon manifestation completely destroys the legitimacy of the page and entire wiki it infests.
The defining characteristic that sets wikidemons apart is the fact that their ego drives their interest in the pages they infest, rather than an actual concern for scolarly pursuits.
Like most generic demons, they liken themselves unto gods above the mere mortals that dare enter their self-proclaimed domain.
This does not mean they have any special or insightful knowledge of the page, but that they merely demand that all other beings must be inferior in their understanding of the posessed pages, as the wikidemon's ego can allow no peers to their self-imagined wisdom.
The wikidemons can be most easily spotted by their domination of article history as perpetually reverting any changes that dare go against their self-worshipped decision of what the page should be, and by their complete domination of an article's talk page, often to the point of responding not only to multiple other people who question their ultimate control of the page, but hapless passers by and even themselves.
There are, at this time, no known ways to truly combat, vanquish, slay, banish, or otherwise exorcise wikidemons from their adopted domains.
Until such a method is devised, wikis will forever remain unreliable sources, as any given wikidemon manifestation completely destroys the legitimacy of the page and entire wiki it infests.
Joe: Why does this page claim satan invented ice cream? I'll remove that reference.
Wikidemon: WHO DARES DISTURB MY SLUMBER? Someone removed my reference to satan inventing icecream? I shall revert this fool's change, and then write 11 paragraphs on the talk page explaining why he's a moron for doubting my logic. It will look nice next to my other 300 paragraphs. I should put it as a reply to myself, since he didn't post to the talk page about why he removed it!
Bob: Why does this page claim satan invented ice cream? I'll remove that reference.
Wikidemon: WHO DARES DISTURB MY SLUMBER?...
Wikidemon: WHO DARES DISTURB MY SLUMBER? Someone removed my reference to satan inventing icecream? I shall revert this fool's change, and then write 11 paragraphs on the talk page explaining why he's a moron for doubting my logic. It will look nice next to my other 300 paragraphs. I should put it as a reply to myself, since he didn't post to the talk page about why he removed it!
Bob: Why does this page claim satan invented ice cream? I'll remove that reference.
Wikidemon: WHO DARES DISTURB MY SLUMBER?...
by Akashic Recorder January 16, 2009
Get the Wikidemon mug.Related Words
wikipedia
• wiki
• wikiHow
• wikileak
• Wikia
• wikiality
• wikinazi
• wikipedian
• wikibomb
• wikipedophile
Reality as defined by the masses (usually in a large collective of internet junkies); refering to the source of all truth, wikipedia, a medium where random facts are collected and corrected by others who are just as uneducated as the rest
by ryanpav September 3, 2006
Get the wikireality mug.A Walking Wikipedia is someone who appears to have more definitions inside them than the famous online dictionary. They will bring up nuggets of amazing information, usually totally irrelevant to the conversation and totally pointless. They are generally admired by people for their knowledge of pointless facts.
Guy 1: 'So did we have any English homework?'
Guy 2: 'I think so, yeah'
Guy 3: 'Did you know that a pig's orgasm lasts for 30 minutes?'
Guy 1: 'Alright you walking wikipedia, thank you but i'm a little busy right now'
Guy 2: 'I think so, yeah'
Guy 3: 'Did you know that a pig's orgasm lasts for 30 minutes?'
Guy 1: 'Alright you walking wikipedia, thank you but i'm a little busy right now'
by Galactrix93 November 6, 2009
Get the Walking Wikipedia mug.When one has no knowledge over a certain subject and or has some school related material to finish, but was either too lazy to read the required material or just plain fucking stupid; so they proceed to gain their half-ass knowledge from said site.
Example 1
Guy #1: Dude I have to write a 4 pg paper on Nietzsche and I have no idea who the fuck he is.
Guy #2: Wikipedia that hoe!
Example 2
Guy #1: Did you hear that David Carradine died from auto-erotic asphyxiation?
Guy #2: Man that sucks....wait whats auto-erotic asphyxiation!? I know I'll just Wikipedia that hoe!
Example #3
Guy #1: Can a guy get pregnant by retrograde ejaculation?
Guy #2: Dude what the fuck is wrong with you...let's Wikipedia that hoe!
Guy #1: Dude I have to write a 4 pg paper on Nietzsche and I have no idea who the fuck he is.
Guy #2: Wikipedia that hoe!
Example 2
Guy #1: Did you hear that David Carradine died from auto-erotic asphyxiation?
Guy #2: Man that sucks....wait whats auto-erotic asphyxiation!? I know I'll just Wikipedia that hoe!
Example #3
Guy #1: Can a guy get pregnant by retrograde ejaculation?
Guy #2: Dude what the fuck is wrong with you...let's Wikipedia that hoe!
by ChiefSlapAHoe October 30, 2010
Get the Wikipedia That Hoe mug.Someone who categorically disputes the accuracy of Wikipedia without knowledge of specific examples. This person believes that Wikipedia is not a 'real encyclopedia' because it doesn't follow a traditional writing / editing process.
Even though Mike was an expert in barebacking, he was just plaing the roll of wikicracker by disputing the Wiki entry, since he didn't even bother reading what was written.
by Le Dutch November 7, 2006
Get the Wikicracker mug.Following Wikipedia links through a diverse series of topics, usually winding up on a subject matter unrelated to the starting article.
I looked up Napoleon on Wikipedia, then spent all night on a wikitrek till I got to an article on arsenic.
by Joe Newberry February 23, 2009
Get the Wikitrek mug.