The flawed reasoning that perfect, absolute neutrality is achievable, or that striving for NPOV is the same as striving for truth. This fallacy has two forms: 1) The idea that a viewpoint can be separated from all perspective (the "view from nowhere"), and 2) The belief that by presenting all sides equally, one has accomplished a fair and accurate representation, even when one side is factually wrong or morally indefensible. It mistakes a procedural ethic for an epistemic guarantee.
Example: Arguing that a Wikipedia article on the shape of the Earth should "fairly represent both the round-Earth and flat-Earth models" in order to be neutral commits the NPOV Fallacy. It elevates the process of balance over the fact of reality, creating a "neutral" article that is fundamentally misleading. True accuracy is sacrificed on the altar of procedural neutrality.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the NPOV Fallacy mug.A person with basic/cookie-cutter opinions regarding stuff like drama/controversies or politics
(note: this is my personal definition.)
(note: this is my personal definition.)
by robokirby February 12, 2026
Get the NPC mug.NO PUSSY BEFORE DECEMBER
Where a woman cannot touch her pussy until December like NNN but for a woman
Where a woman cannot touch her pussy until December like NNN but for a woman
Betty: “man… We got to participate in NPBD…”
Cassie: “What is NPBD?”
Betty: “No pussy before December”
Cassie: “What is NPBD?”
Betty: “No pussy before December”
by Add.mp7 February 8, 2025
Get the NPBD mug.by Add.mp7 February 8, 2025
Get the NPBD mug.by j s h/)$3))3)j February 16, 2025
Get the npcharlis mug.by 33tena May 31, 2025
Get the NPO mug.