Skip to main content
It is the opposite of pp. “pp” standing for penis. “Ps ps” stands for vagina (women’s genitalia). We call over pet cats by making the sound “ps ps” and cats are referred to as pussy cats. Vaginas are also called “pussy” hence the cross over and for short vaginas can be called “ps ps” same way penises are called “pp’s”
You gonna get some ps ps tonight bro?
Ps ps by Jizzkitten March 30, 2026
Ps ps mug front
Get the Ps ps mug.
See more merch

Psychology of Evidence, Science, and Logic

A field that studies how human minds actually engage with evidence, science, and logic—including cognitive biases, motivated reasoning, the role of emotion in scientific judgment, and the psychological appeal of conspiratorial thinking. It examines how scientists themselves are subject to the same cognitive limitations as everyone else, and how the ideal of pure reason is never fully attainable.
Example: “The psychology of evidence, science, and logic research showed that even expert scientists exhibited confirmation bias when reviewing papers from competing labs—the brain does not become purely rational with a PhD.”
Related Words

Psychology of Hegemonic Official Discourses

A subfield focusing on the psychological grip that dominant official narratives exert over populations. It investigates how hegemonic discourses become internalized as common sense, how they shape identity, and how they create psychological barriers to imagining alternatives. It also studies resistance: how individuals and groups psychologically disengage from official narratives and construct counter‑worldviews.
Example: “His research in the psychology of hegemonic official discourses revealed that citizens who had internalized the official story of the nation experienced cognitive dissonance when confronted with contrary evidence—they literally struggled to process facts that threatened their identity.”

Psychology of Official Discourse

A field that investigates the cognitive and emotional effects of official discourse on individuals and groups. It examines how repeated exposure to official language shapes beliefs, triggers emotional responses (fear, hope, trust), and influences memory. It also explores how individuals internalize official narratives, and how psychological mechanisms like cognitive dissonance or motivated reasoning sustain belief in official accounts even when they conflict with experience.
Example: “The psychology of official discourse research found that after repeated exposure to the phrase ‘national security,’ people’s tolerance for civil liberties restrictions increased—language conditioned emotional response.”

Psycholighting

A form of Digitallighting that weaponizes mental health language to destabilize and discredit a target. The perpetrator questions the target’s sanity, often simply for holding beliefs or expressing experiences that deviate from the perpetrator’s worldview. They persistently imply that the target is “mentally unstable,” “delusional,” “needs help,” or “should see a psychiatrist,” regardless of the target’s actual mental state. Psycholighting often follows a pattern: the target shares a personal experience (e.g., spiritual insight, unusual perception); the perpetrator responds with mock concern (“are you okay?”) then escalates to armchair diagnosis; finally, they use the target’s defensive reaction as “proof” of instability. It is especially common in debates about religion, spirituality, and unconventional experiences.
Example: “When she posted about her meditation experiences in a spiritual subreddit, a neo‑atheist replied questioning her sanity, then disagreed with everything she said, then suggested she was schizophrenic. Psycholighting: using mental health as a cudgel against difference.”
Psycholighting by Abzugal March 31, 2026

Pseudoquasianthropomorphisation

The process of sort of (quasi-) having attributes of human traits, but actually not (pseudo-)

Pseudoquasianthropomorphization, US spelling.
As he pretended to turn into a half man half horse, he underwent pseudoquasianthropomorphisation.

Psychology of Debunking

The study of the psychological motives, cognitive processes, and emotional dynamics that drive debunking behavior. It examines why certain individuals become passionate debunkers, how debunking provides a sense of identity and purpose, what cognitive biases affect debunkers (overconfidence, confirmation bias, the bias blind spot), and how the act of debunking can become emotionally addictive. It also studies the psychological impact on targets of debunking and the role of debunking in online group dynamics. The psychology of debunking reveals that even “rational” debunking is shaped by the same human needs for belonging, status, and meaning as any other community.
Example: “The psychology of debunking research found that many online skeptics reported personal trauma from religious upbringing, and debunking served as both a coping mechanism and a way to feel superior—not just evidencebased, but emotionally driven.”