Super Duper Scientists

the amazing group of scientists only few are privileged enough to be a part of while many wish they were

those people are just such super duper scientists, i wish i was part of their group.

by speedytwiggy February 3, 2010

Scientistic Aristocracy

Scientistic Aristocracy is a social and political stance where positivism, scientism and new atheism tend to lead into an aristocratic organization of science, education, technology and society. Scientistic aristocracy mainly used to refer to the social organization of a cultural atheist society and of a state atheist society. Scientistic aristocracy is usually culturally centre, centre-leaning and supports scientific centrism and state atheism.

"Scientistic Aristocracy is the social and political organization of the academia and of science nowadays. Scientism and neopositivism always lead into aristocratic organization of society, since the goal of scientism and neopositivism is to make charlatanism tor aristocratic proposes, and anyone with basic knowledge on philosophy of science can realize it."

by Full Monteirism March 31, 2021

Scientistic Shillism

Scientistic Shillism, also refered as Scientific Shillism, is an ideology that unites Scientistic Aristocracy and Scientific Centrism with Shillism, it basically supports that science dissemination on Internet and science disseminators on Internet should be most neo-positivist as possible and use of science for attack religion, spirituality, esoterics, occultism, metaphysics/extraphysics/nonphysics, multiverses and so on calling all of them as "pseudosciences" and often comparing them to pseudosciences like Flat Earth, Climate Denial, Antivax and so on. Scientistic Shillism is often characterized by it's heavy support on material reductionism and by creating strawmen about science as if all scientists were extremely material reductionist, physicalist, neo-positivist, anti-spiritual, anti-religion, anti-esoteric, anti-occultist, anti-metaphysical and as if literally all atheists were material reductionism and that metaphysical beliefs and philosophy were harmful to society and pseudoscientific and only analytical philosophy is the correct one.

"Scientistic Shillism became a really problem nowadays, mainly among scientific community online, it's really hard to search for scientific things online that don't fit on scientistic shillism category. It only shows that how much we need to protect science, and not just that, also protect philosophy, religion, spirituality, esoterics and occultism of scientistic shillists and all of them unite themselves to avoid things like scientific shillism to become a thing."

by Full Monteirism May 2, 2021

Scientisim

According to flerfs, Science is a blindly followed religion. Trusting and believing everything that NASA and scientists tell us.

McGlobester says otherwise.

You’re not an atheist if you believe in Scientisim you sheep shill - Water World 2.0.

by McGlobester August 6, 2023

Tobacco Institute Scientist

Originally, a scientist hired by the Tobacco Institute to refute the findings that tobacco use resulted in cancer. Generally, it has expanded to mean any scientist paid by a moneyed interest to refute a scientific consensus or to create a false appearance of disagreement within the scientific community.

Did you hear that the Tobacco Institute Scientists over at Exxon-Mobile found there is no such thing as global warming?

by The Amazing Science-Man April 20, 2012

crazy scientist blah

The Crazy Scientist blah is a Blah man that Predicts that the world will crash into the sun in FIVE SECONDs. this is found in the Demented Cartoon Movie.

person A: what are you up to Professor blah (crazy scientist blah)?
Crazy Scientist Blah: well, i just figured out that the world is going to crash into the sun in five seconds.

by Hailey June 19, 2006

scientism

Religion based on science.

Many fundamentalist Christians tell me that the world is six thousand years old. They say the Bible says so, indirectly, and they show this by comparing genealogies from Adam to Jesus. These add up to 4,000 years, and Jesus was born 2,000 years ago. I do NOT believe this because SCIENCE says otherwise.

Get REAL! Get SCIENTISM!

by Agnos Morehead August 5, 2006