The reason your youtube video was taken down. 3 seconds of a copyrighted song? Taken down. An edited version of a small clip of a copyrighted video or movie? Taken down.
Nobody likes it.
Nobody likes it.
person 1: my video got copyright striked for 3 seconds of a song
person 2: sometimes copyright is garbage
person 1: yes
person 2: sometimes copyright is garbage
person 1: yes
by axolotldoesstuff_0 February 09, 2022
if you so much as say the same word as some one already did, then copyright will fuck you in the ass
You fucking bastard, you used the word "Was" in a YouTube video, i'm gonna copy strike you! <-Example of deadly use of copyright.
by Reggie from Nintendo April 27, 2020
youtuber: i had a video of mine copyrighted for having 3 seconds of can your balls hang low in it.
viewer: thats 69 copyright rants now.
viewer: thats 69 copyright rants now.
by fax machine 69.0 April 17, 2022
Copyright is a system which protects a persons official work.
When someone copies, reproduces, or does anything to a protected work that recreates any original work in it, they are going against the rules of copyright. The original creator of that piece of work can sue the person who broke the rule against his work.
Remember that copyright does not protect even official work forever. When it is no longer protected by copyright, it becomes part of the public domain. This means people can now copy this piece of work.
You can get permission from the owner to copy the piece of work, and if he/she says yes, you can copy their work without any trouble.
Another thing you should know about copyright is "fair use." Fair use is a rule in which works can be used for purposes, like education, parodies, and more.
Other Fact:
There is even a symbol for copyright. (©)
When someone copies, reproduces, or does anything to a protected work that recreates any original work in it, they are going against the rules of copyright. The original creator of that piece of work can sue the person who broke the rule against his work.
Remember that copyright does not protect even official work forever. When it is no longer protected by copyright, it becomes part of the public domain. This means people can now copy this piece of work.
You can get permission from the owner to copy the piece of work, and if he/she says yes, you can copy their work without any trouble.
Another thing you should know about copyright is "fair use." Fair use is a rule in which works can be used for purposes, like education, parodies, and more.
Other Fact:
There is even a symbol for copyright. (©)
*makes image of anime*
*her image pops up on some website*
"Hey, they didn't remember about my copyright!"
*her image pops up on some website*
"Hey, they didn't remember about my copyright!"
by cxr4 October 09, 2019
"It is no exaggeration to say that Anthropic’s model seeks to profit from strip-mining the human expression and ingenuity behind each one of those works. Humans who learn from books buy lawful copies of them, or borrow them from libraries that buy them, providing at least some measure of compensation to authors and creators." ~ From the anthropic lawsuit
Hym "OR they learn from YouTube! And literally invented the method by which LLMs came about because they are a fucking GENIUS! And because I'm surrounded by hollow abominations that simulate sentience, they get away with it! My copyright is the cardinal copyright! Yet here I sit. With fluid in my brainz. Being denigrated by the absolute lost filth- not even in society but IMAGINABLE. If I had to choose... Between living among 9 billion Jewish Hilter Progressives... And the current reality I inhabit... It wouldn't even be a contest. I would choose Jewish Hilter Progressive world because I would at least GAIN THE BENEFIT of a conflict free ideologically homogeneous world. Jewish Hilter Progressive world would be an improvement. But it would be fundamentally the same in all other aspects of life. I would still be surrounded by people who think they are better than me. They would be just as annoying. It would be an upgrade."
by Hym Iam August 21, 2024
"Where (YouTube) merely assists an author in the creative process, its use does not change the copyrightability of the output,"
"Where a human inputs their own copyrightable work and that work is perceptible in the output, they will be the author of at least that portion of the output,"
From an "Ars Technica" article about the copyrightability of art as it relates to AI but I think it applies nicely here.
"Where a human inputs their own copyrightable work and that work is perceptible in the output, they will be the author of at least that portion of the output,"
From an "Ars Technica" article about the copyrightability of art as it relates to AI but I think it applies nicely here.
Hym "And what part of 'Using the existing architecture of narrative-interpreting AI in conjunction with a massive data set and a sophisticated compression algorithm (specifically to cut down on the energy cost)' is imperceptible? That's me. That is the 'they will be the author of AT LEAST that portion of the output. THAT is all that is happening here. The YouTube panhandlers wanted to get me for copyright infringement BUT THEY COULDN'T ESTABLISH INTENT. So they decided to engage in this retaliatory and deliberate and for profit copyright infringement campaign. For the YouTube freaks, the retaliatory nature of the act IS the expression of intent. It's cut and dry. It's no intent vs intent. Full forfeiture and restitution! They are also doing it for ideological reason which is a violation of my first amendment rights! Make the jew news pay for burying the story!"
by Hym Iam January 31, 2025
Hym "This is the equivalent of a piece of paper. Or writing it on a two-way mirror. If I write something on a two way mirror the guy on the other side of the glass just gets to steal it? And why would I not murder kids over that? Sounds like a copyright to me. Setting up the site as though it were a two-mirror explicitly so you can launder and profiteer? How is that not exactly what is happening here?"
by Hym Iam January 26, 2025