Extraphysical Absence Paradox

The extraphysical absense paradox is a stance where there's no clear objective/scientific evidence that extraphysics actually exist or that extraphysics are actually an objective thing and that extraphysics actually makes no difference in people's lives and even that extraphysics would have already been detected by particle accelerators or even by any other kind of objective physical experiment and not just on astral projections, out-of-body experiments and spiritual experiences as well. Some counter-arguments used against extraphysical absence paradox is the same one used against Physical-Extraphysical Dependence Paradox where physics and extraphysics are the same thing on different levels (Extraphysical Monism); other is that physical (classical and quantum) experiments are made only to work at physical level, not extraphysical; and that there are actually (clear) objective/scientific evidences and explanations for extraphysics but it's all a matter of interpretation and understanding of the nature of the interaction between physics and extraphysics.

"The Extraphysical Absence Paradox and the Physical-Extraphysical Dependence Paradox are the two main arguments against extraphysics, if not, the top two ones, and that's nice extraphysics is managing to survive against those arguments and experimentations, and soon, we might detect and prove extraphysics are real and objective soon or later, extraphysics/nonphysics is amazing just as quantum mechanics and physics as a whole."

by Full Monteirism May 6, 2021

PARADOXICAL SUMMATIONS

The sum of two singular expressions which intuitively makes sense but the PLURAL is never conclusive and because of that in the first place both SINGULARS ARE INACCURATE to reach the PLURAL which is there where the paradox formation occurs.

E.9 A.15 I.22 T.27 D.27 O.28 R.30 H.33 F.35 S.38 C.38 U.40 G.40 L.42 W.42 Q.42 N.45 P.45 B.46 Y.47 K.51 J.52 M.53 V.66 X.68 Z.72

In this example the SUMMATIONS individually of EACH CIRCLE comes very close in EQUALING TOTAL DEGREES IN A CIRCLE but the PLURAL itself is 153 DEGREES OFF.

CIRCLE.179 CIRCLE.179 CIRCLE CIRCLE.358

CIRCLES.217

THE PARADOXICAL SUMMATIONS of CIRCLE in the SINGULAR form does not lead to the SUMMATIONS in the PLURAL FORM.

The PARADOXICAL SUMMATIONS CIRCLE CIRCLE.358 almost equals the number of DEGREES in a CIRCLE by using the two PLURAL taken each ELEMENT SEPARATELY IF you counted each CIRCLE as a DEGREE it indeed would EQUAL 360 DEGREES as if counting the TWO DEGREES OF FREEDOM.

by SEE YOUR ASSH0LE May 8, 2021

Baldwin's gun paradox

Baldwin's gun paradox typically occurs when a specific and equal amount of responsibility is distributed to a number of individuals surpassing the sum of 1, usually as a form of repetitive fail-safe (ie verify that a gun is not loaded with real bullets before it is fired at someone or confirming that no one is standing in the industrial oven with a timed locked door before it is turned on), sometimes resulting in each successive person erroneously believing that the person prior to them made the proper verification which they are now themselves certifying without any actual verification from their part as required by their role. Any guilt resulting from a catastrophic failure of the entire verification chain will either be attributed to none of the individuals involved or exclusively to the lowest person on the totem pole.
See also: Shit trickles down rule

"Determining culpability in this case will be Baldwin's gun paradox all over again"
"I would like to plead Baldwin's gun paradox as my defense judge"

by Prisme November 5, 2021

Paradox

slang

'para' being slang for "pair of" and 'dox' meaning to have your phone number and address be leaked. so paradox refers to when someone doxes two people at once. It is seen as a flex to those in hacker online chat rooms.

Guy 1:His social security number is 5768 and hers is 67049 and his phone number is 50963 while hers is 5067.
Guy 2: bro! no way you just hit a paradox. guy 3 is gonna be so jealous!
Guy 1: hey man, it's just what I do best.

Guy 2: heard guy 3 was too busy having a three-some to hack into their accounts tonight.
Guy 1: that's embarassing.
Guy 2: yeah.

by bestie b0b0 November 15, 2021

THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW DOUBLE PARADOX

sorry we are full at this time.

WE ARE PEDOPHILE FRIENDLY!!!!! ,. sssshhhh!!!!!! (260.109)...(369)....

It brings up an amazing MATHUFRACTURES CONCEPT where it says what THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW PARADOX says that PLURAL = SINGULAR which grandly implies another stated as due to "CONSENSUS TUMULT POTENTIAL" the "ZERO TOLERANCE" in many instances is operational . In other words , the THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW PARADOX = THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW DOUBLE PARADOX which says the NULL = ZEROFYER from NULLIFY as ZER0FYER = SINGULAR = PLURAL where NO PEDOPHILES are allowed at certain places as per management decision of the HOTEL ITSELF.

THE more PEDOPHILES the better which is a management hotel/motel THAT SKIRTS , THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW because many hotels/motels ABUSE THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW by not granting any passage.

Note in CYPHER this is a DERIVATION of the WUHAN GRINDR 369. MORE ON THAT LATER ..

by NOBLE PEACE SUNDER EEE March 9, 2022

THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW PARADOX

Does not exist as "WILLIAM HENRY GATES III clearly spent enough time and research with composing this law and wrote into it plainly all aspects given his VAST AWARENESS running the BILL MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION.

If you want to find a reason to break THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW by using the excuse as the PEDOPHILE already entered our property as the THE "ONE PEDOPHILE" LAW PARADOX says SINGULAR = PLURAL at all times when any EYES COLORED PEDOPHILE walks into your PROPERTY or ESTABLISHMENT and you are "commanded to make THE ONE feel comfortable but "THE PEDOPHILE " had to follow what they are required to do while there and it is not epic splendor .

by NOBLE PEACE SUNDER EEE March 9, 2022

Urban Dictionary Paradox

When you try to make a joke definition of an Urban dictionary link, but it says can't contain links in the definition, so you remove the link and submit it, thinking the problem is resolved and your funny joke is through. But then it says definition must have word in it, but the word is the source of the other problem.

Human: I can't wait to joke about urbandictionary's blog page!
*Human goes to website, adds definition, writes 'funny' definition, presses submit*
Website: There was 1 error that prohibited this form from being submitted (Links)
Human: Ok then, I will remove the link.
Website: There was 1 error that prohibited this form from being submitted (Not having the word in the example)
Human: HELP ME, I AM IN THE Urban Dictionary Paradox!!!!!!!

by Trumpium March 17, 2022