The Lego can withstand the force of 950 LB before braking. It is consider Denmark's weapon of mass destruction.
Oh,no.. no,no,no,no,no,no,no,no! There coming...and they have Denmark's weapon of mass destruction! we are screwed
by Dr.FreezeLove March 15, 2017
A set of Tits...a monstrous ass...or any other part of the female body you have seen in porn vids or pictures that demands masturbation. Especially if said video/picture can be "USED" multiple times for viewing pleasure.
Dude did you see the monstrous clit on that Armenian stripper in that video? Going home to download that.....will be used as a WMT?
WTF is a WMT?
(WMT's:WEAPONS OF MASS TURBATION!) Im gonna pull a muscle jerkin my beef to this!
WMT's: Weapons of Mass Turbation..Huge tits,Huge ass, lovely clit....anything you can wack off to.
WTF is a WMT?
(WMT's:WEAPONS OF MASS TURBATION!) Im gonna pull a muscle jerkin my beef to this!
WMT's: Weapons of Mass Turbation..Huge tits,Huge ass, lovely clit....anything you can wack off to.
by Urban Millz July 18, 2012
Mass Gamer Stockholm Syndrome, also known as MaGSS, is a psychological condition in which gamers will do anything to defend their favorite game or franchise. Gamers are 'taken hostage' by there games and defend the game to great extend, regardless of game quality. Games with pay 2 win and bugfested games are often being defended by their fanbase. Common sense will rarely work to change their minds.
Reasoning like "you can still unlock everything without spending money", "Skill is more important than spendings" or "it's not as bad as people say it is" are common.
Clearly buggy hitboxes in FPS games are often defended by saying things like "It's because your aim is off".
The psychological condition has strong ties to choise-supportive bias or post-purchase rationalization.
Reasoning like "you can still unlock everything without spending money", "Skill is more important than spendings" or "it's not as bad as people say it is" are common.
Clearly buggy hitboxes in FPS games are often defended by saying things like "It's because your aim is off".
The psychological condition has strong ties to choise-supportive bias or post-purchase rationalization.
Person 1: Dude, Battlefront 2 is so Pay 2 Win.
Victim: Dude, that's not pay 2 win. You can unlock everything ingame. The advantage you get is not that big, a good player without spending money will still beat a bad player who spend money.
Person 1: Dude, you are simply suffering from Mass Gamer Stockholm Syndrome.
Victim: I don't care, just gonna enjoy the game.
Victim: Dude, that's not pay 2 win. You can unlock everything ingame. The advantage you get is not that big, a good player without spending money will still beat a bad player who spend money.
Person 1: Dude, you are simply suffering from Mass Gamer Stockholm Syndrome.
Victim: I don't care, just gonna enjoy the game.
by ai caramba November 20, 2017
The phrase used to bait gamers into a mindless debate either calling for BioWare blood in response to a sense of entitlement, or defending it from a lofty position of sophistication and arrogance - because everyone seems to know better than everyone else.
Friend 1: "So... you catch the Mass Effect 3 ending?"
Friend 2: "Yeah, I saw everyone on the internet going off about it. Fucking babies - it's a game, grow up. Learn to take disappointment blah blah blah..."
Friend 3: "Oh shut up. They totally fucked over the fanbase. It was really badly done - full of plotholes and bad writing and blah blah blah... BioWare/EA should patch it!"
Friend 1: "Oh for fuck's sake."
Friend 2: "Yeah, I saw everyone on the internet going off about it. Fucking babies - it's a game, grow up. Learn to take disappointment blah blah blah..."
Friend 3: "Oh shut up. They totally fucked over the fanbase. It was really badly done - full of plotholes and bad writing and blah blah blah... BioWare/EA should patch it!"
Friend 1: "Oh for fuck's sake."
by Retake Mass Effect 3 or Don't March 20, 2012
This observed scientific fact that disproves the idea of a creator, for the sum of matter and energy in the universe often change form to one another but get neither CREATED nor destroyed... give it up, religious fundamentalists.
God possibly represents the energy before the universe that exploded into the universe, but most certainly gets disproved as a separate person or entity, by the law of conservation of mass-energy.
by Supermanprime666 February 04, 2013
by Merlyn June 29, 2003
by DanSussex November 24, 2007