A member of the plurality internet subculture in which people claim to be multiple identities living in one body.
Many plurals are Gen Z and "discover" their plurality after suggestions by another plural.
Plurals usually engage in attention seeking and expect to be interesting to others, seeing their unstable sense of identity as cool and fun.
Plurals' identities may include animals, demons, characters from games or TV, or other non-human identities, but these can post on the internet and speak. They may claim hundreds or thousands - no gatekeeping is allowed.
Plurals have a strong sense of political identity despite having no support in science or theory for their claims of having multiple identities, as described by Emily Christensen (2021).
Plurals dating use the term "system partner" to reflect their partner is plural.
A few plurals have DID or OSDD (mental disorders involving multiple personalities caused by prolonged childhood trauma), and align to the psychiatric survivor movement.
The plural movement is harmful to people with DID and OSDD, promotes myths about their disorders, involves cultural appropriation of mental illness and uses medical terms for normal experiences. Many plurals are insensitive and hostile to people with DID or OSDD who don't identify as plural, calling them trauscum or sysmed.
Many plurals are Gen Z and "discover" their plurality after suggestions by another plural.
Plurals usually engage in attention seeking and expect to be interesting to others, seeing their unstable sense of identity as cool and fun.
Plurals' identities may include animals, demons, characters from games or TV, or other non-human identities, but these can post on the internet and speak. They may claim hundreds or thousands - no gatekeeping is allowed.
Plurals have a strong sense of political identity despite having no support in science or theory for their claims of having multiple identities, as described by Emily Christensen (2021).
Plurals dating use the term "system partner" to reflect their partner is plural.
A few plurals have DID or OSDD (mental disorders involving multiple personalities caused by prolonged childhood trauma), and align to the psychiatric survivor movement.
The plural movement is harmful to people with DID and OSDD, promotes myths about their disorders, involves cultural appropriation of mental illness and uses medical terms for normal experiences. Many plurals are insensitive and hostile to people with DID or OSDD who don't identify as plural, calling them trauscum or sysmed.
Joe came out as plural, and uses many different names and identities on his tiktok account. Joe is friends with his other identities, which he calls "head mates", and helped his girlfriend recognize her plurality.
(Adjective) Someone who is average; Like-minded to the majority of the populous; Generally lacking intuition or perseverance;
by Piedrasanta September 17, 2021
Stuffy: Noun (Plural: Stuffers)
We should enslave every and all stuffers. Stuffy Enslavement Union, rejoice!
We should enslave every and all stuffers. Stuffy Enslavement Union, rejoice!
by Drooper is poggers June 15, 2021
Being romantically involved with more than one person at one time and all involved parties are aware and accepting of it.
by ApricotFields May 30, 2024
Romantic/emotionally intimate, non-platonic relationships whether dating, courtship, marriage etc. held by someone with more than one other person at one time with full disclosure among all parties.
by ApricotFields May 21, 2025
When you’re so fucking smart that you accurately answer two questions at once with one calculated “What?”.
i was writing this but lost too many brain cells and will come back to this once i’m strong enough, Plural Version of Whats
by 20inchrim May 24, 2022
A "We are the world"-Esque delusion that is both undesirable and impossible.
Hym "Pluralism requires the religions to be transformed into something they are not. If the religions are resistant to the change that pluralism requires will inevitably be disempowered. Either by the state or the communication networks. It's at that point you have a hierarchy of religious dogma, backed by the state and communications networks, and it's going to elevate the religions that more closely align with your progressive sensibilities above the religions who do not. What you are suggesting is nothing more than liberals controlling the religions with soft power from the outside in a way that allows them to deny their own culpability. What happens to the Muslim fundamentalists who think gays should be thrown off buildings? What happens to the Christian fundamentalists who object to abortion on religious grounds? They both take a backseat to the other religions that allow your liberal bullshit pluralism to dictate (from the top down) which religions can accrue power. Your pluralism IS the precursor to the hierarchy you condemn. And that was my initial criticism of the Atheist pluralists. 'The religions would be fine if they believed what I believe. I should be the God. As long as the religion is promoting my progressive politics then it's fine.'
Hym "Pluralism requires the religions to be transformed into something they are not. If the religions are resistant to the change that pluralism requires will inevitably be disempowered. Either by the state or the communication networks. It's at that point you have a hierarchy of religious dogma, backed by the state and communications networks, and it's going to elevate the religions that more closely align with your progressive sensibilities above the religions who do not. What you are suggesting is nothing more than liberals controlling the religions with soft power from the outside in a way that allows them to deny their own culpability. What happens to the Muslim fundamentalists who think gays should be thrown off buildings? What happens to the Christian fundamentalists who object to abortion on religious grounds? They both take a backseat to the other religions that allow your liberal bullshit pluralism to dictate (from the top down) which religions can accrue power. Your pluralism IS the precursor to the hierarchy you condemn. And that was my initial criticism of the Atheist pluralists. 'The religions would be fine if they believed what I believe. I should be the God. As long as the religion is promoting my progressive politics then it's fine.'
You want the moral authority for yourselves. You're trying to dress it up as this benign thing and it isn't. So no. No pluralism. The only solution to religion is to create a system that is impervious to and unaffected by believe. You can have your little incest cult and you can have your liberal politics but I, as an individual, do not have to lend any credence to your religion, don't have to do what your God says, and to discriminate against me or transgress upon me for doing so is a violation of my religious liberty. We need to get this subjective prescriptive behavior out of people's lives and turn society into an input/output mechanism where people can contribute independently from and regardless of their beliefs and receive output commensurate with their contributions. So, if THAT is what you mean by pluralism, then fine. But it doesn't sound like it. Maybe I'm missing something. Additionally, focusing on Hindu voices when speaking about Hinduism is just a way of preemptively undermining dissent against Hinduism. I can just as easily say that we should prioritize dissent."
by Hym Iam February 03, 2025