Wikipedia has some serious problems. Wikipedia articles/entries that are about History or Politics are often unreliable, extremely biased, and incredibly one sided. There are many examples of Wikipedia articles totally contradicting each other and presenting the contradictions as fact. There also many examples of Wikipedia articles stating totally FALSE information with weak citations and evidence that readers think is factual.
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, content can be changed by anyone for any reason, so each article will most likely be written by someone who has a passion for the topic and therefore a bias for or against it. Wikipedia administrators are shadowy figures that can have very strong biases, and they control what you see and read on Wikipedia, effectively altering public opinion to fit their narrative and beliefs. Take what you read on Wikipedia with a huge grain of salt.
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, content can be changed by anyone for any reason, so each article will most likely be written by someone who has a passion for the topic and therefore a bias for or against it. Wikipedia administrators are shadowy figures that can have very strong biases, and they control what you see and read on Wikipedia, effectively altering public opinion to fit their narrative and beliefs. Take what you read on Wikipedia with a huge grain of salt.
by YungGravyy May 12, 2019
Get the Wikipedia mug.That douchebag whole spends all day on Wikipedia and then thinks they're the smartest person in the world when in reality they're probably just reciting words and have know idea what they mean.
Most prominantly seen when teachers/professors present new material and the wikipedia genius has to blab out the first paragraph of the wikipedia page about it. After commended for being so smart they are usually asked a more in-depth question and have no clue about it.
Most prominantly seen when teachers/professors present new material and the wikipedia genius has to blab out the first paragraph of the wikipedia page about it. After commended for being so smart they are usually asked a more in-depth question and have no clue about it.
I swear if that wikipedia genius acts like he's smarter than me I'm gonna smash his laptop and then we'll see who knows more.
by Fredrick Brown May 5, 2008
Get the wikipedia genius mug.Related Words
A site that sounds and looks good at a first glance. While Wikipedia can be a useful resource for quick research, the community is probably the worst on the net, and actually trying to edit an article will lead to pointless debates about "POV" and "assuming good faith" that make it not even worth it.
Wikipedia is a site:
Where an 18 year old with Asperger's who spends 18 hours a day editing has the same say as a Harvard professor.
Where you'll find pictures of mutilated penises and nude decapitated women galore, but if you create an account with "poop" or "sex" as part of your screenname, you'll be banned for having an "offensive username".
Where 12 year old kids are given admin access, so if a guy with a doctorate in quantum mechanics happens to piss of some 12 year old Pokemon fan with admin powers, he just might get the banhammer.
Where articles on obscure Pokemon characters, individual Family Guy episodes, and Japanese porn cartoons get featured on the homepage, and are more detailed and accurate in content than articles on American history.
Where you can listen to audio articles on "death erection" and "cumshot", but not "World War II" or "Abraham Lincoln".
Wikipedia is a site:
Where an 18 year old with Asperger's who spends 18 hours a day editing has the same say as a Harvard professor.
Where you'll find pictures of mutilated penises and nude decapitated women galore, but if you create an account with "poop" or "sex" as part of your screenname, you'll be banned for having an "offensive username".
Where 12 year old kids are given admin access, so if a guy with a doctorate in quantum mechanics happens to piss of some 12 year old Pokemon fan with admin powers, he just might get the banhammer.
Where articles on obscure Pokemon characters, individual Family Guy episodes, and Japanese porn cartoons get featured on the homepage, and are more detailed and accurate in content than articles on American history.
Where you can listen to audio articles on "death erection" and "cumshot", but not "World War II" or "Abraham Lincoln".
Wikipedia is like a sausage, you may like the taste of it but you don't necessarily want to see how it's made.
by SlickSammy9393 April 25, 2011
Get the Wikipedia mug.The place where you go when the word you're looking for is too sophisticated to be found on UrbanDictionary.
by FinnishPunk July 11, 2004
Get the wikipedia mug.Male, no social life, compulsively asking wikipedia all kind of questions, day and night becoming a wikipedofile.
by mave73 February 29, 2008
Get the wikipedofile mug.when someone randomly clicks on the blue highlighted words on a wiki article until he/she feels they are reading about something completely unrelated to the original article.
by vucknaquaterodge October 21, 2009
Get the wikipedia train mug.noun. it's a "thing" -- that unsatisfied grimace one gives or receives when Wikipedia is presented as a reliable source for information. The emoticon equivalent is >:\
Eileen: I went to the library for help finding information on Vedic chanting and the librarian sent me to Wikipedia.
Sam: THEY DID WHAT?!
Eileen: Yeah, I gave them the Wikipedia face >:\
Sam: THEY DID WHAT?!
Eileen: Yeah, I gave them the Wikipedia face >:\
by TeamJizzless April 25, 2013
Get the Wikipedia face mug.