The less Agularian form of Voulez-vous coucher avec moi, ce soir.
Translates to: You will want to make love with me tonight.
You: "tu aurais envie de faire l'amour ce soir?"
Panties: *drop*
Translates to: You will want to make love with me tonight.
You: "tu aurais envie de faire l'amour ce soir?"
Panties: *drop*
by Jusical Musical May 22, 2014
Get the tu aurais envie de faire l'amour ce soir mug.by lil booty wipe February 21, 2018
Get the tu madre es homosexual mug.Ciao Bello: Ah man, I just got killed. There were tu many of them.
tom_843: Lol yeah, tu many indeed.
Person 1: god damn tu many enemies.
Person 2: tell me about it dude
tom_843: Lol yeah, tu many indeed.
Person 1: god damn tu many enemies.
Person 2: tell me about it dude
by tom_843 January 2, 2011
Get the Tu Many mug.A phrase commonly used by the native people of New Zealand, Maoris, to show that they are impressed or show respect for your actions. Its literal translation is too much.
by NZ fulla February 27, 2011
Get the Tu Meke mug.(LOGIC) a logical fallacy in which a person defends against an allegation by accusing an adversary of doing the same thing. It's a classic douchebag move because it implies that the speaker has a RIGHT to be a douchebag, by virtue of the fact that someone ELSE is being a douchebag.
From Latin, for "you, too."
WHY IT'S BAD
Suppose A is accused of terrorism. He reacts by accusing B, his enemy, of terrorism. Now, it's possible (but unlikely) that A actually chose this argument knowing he was totally innocent. More likely he wants to claim that his terrorism is PROVOKED. In effect, he's saying, "I have to do this, or I'm entitled to do this, because B did it first."
First, as logic it's a red herring. But what makes it douchebaggery rather than just another wartime propaganda tactic, is that it's MORALLY irrelevant as well as LOGICALLY irrelevant. The victims of terrorism almost never have any material control over either perpetrator ever.
From Latin, for "you, too."
WHY IT'S BAD
Suppose A is accused of terrorism. He reacts by accusing B, his enemy, of terrorism. Now, it's possible (but unlikely) that A actually chose this argument knowing he was totally innocent. More likely he wants to claim that his terrorism is PROVOKED. In effect, he's saying, "I have to do this, or I'm entitled to do this, because B did it first."
First, as logic it's a red herring. But what makes it douchebaggery rather than just another wartime propaganda tactic, is that it's MORALLY irrelevant as well as LOGICALLY irrelevant. The victims of terrorism almost never have any material control over either perpetrator ever.
ANNA: Abu Yahya, I don't know if your definition of "tu quoque fallacy" belongs in the Urban Dictionary. This isn't Wikipedia, you know.
ABU YAHYA: The reason I did is that I see all the time people using the rationale that, because somebody else did something bad to me, therefore I get to do something similar to anybody. It's sort of like sloppy revenge.
ANNA: Like men punishing random women because their girlfriends allegedly did something shitty to them?
ABU YAHYA: Actually, that's a perfect example of a tu quoque!
ABU YAHYA: The reason I did is that I see all the time people using the rationale that, because somebody else did something bad to me, therefore I get to do something similar to anybody. It's sort of like sloppy revenge.
ANNA: Like men punishing random women because their girlfriends allegedly did something shitty to them?
ABU YAHYA: Actually, that's a perfect example of a tu quoque!
by Abu Yahya June 3, 2010
Get the tu quoque fallacy mug.by latinstonecold October 22, 2009
Get the Tu te fous de ma gueule? mug.by funkJones March 8, 2005
Get the tu sheng peng mug.