A person who is half human half mole due to their love of staying in dark rooms and sleeping for ridiculously extended periods of time
by bananavsmole September 01, 2010
To mole is to curve one's hands in a claw-like shape and make furious digging motions inside another's rectum. The phrase "Can you dig it?" was originally a reference to this practice.
The terms "Mole" and "Hole", in noun form, sometimes refer to moler and molee respectively.
The terms "Mole" and "Hole", in noun form, sometimes refer to moler and molee respectively.
(1)
"Yooo you wanna chill this weekend?"
"Naah dude I can't... I'm molin' my hole"
"Who's your hole?"
"Cole"
"I thought Baird was his mole..."
"Nope. Cole's my hole."
(2)
"I'm constipated."
"Ever try moling?"
"Let's try moling."
"Yooo you wanna chill this weekend?"
"Naah dude I can't... I'm molin' my hole"
"Who's your hole?"
"Cole"
"I thought Baird was his mole..."
"Nope. Cole's my hole."
(2)
"I'm constipated."
"Ever try moling?"
"Let's try moling."
by beeeeees October 07, 2011
a brown spot usually on ones face, sometimes accompanied by a nasty hair.
a mole causes unattractiveness.
usually its the people named ian who have moles.
occasionally people get picked on because of their moles.
the most common comeback for someone with a mole is, "itsa birthmark!!!"
a mole causes unattractiveness.
usually its the people named ian who have moles.
occasionally people get picked on because of their moles.
the most common comeback for someone with a mole is, "itsa birthmark!!!"
by wolfwes April 12, 2008
by Johnny Appleseed January 27, 2005
by Jigga1515 July 12, 2010
by Johnny money bravo January 16, 2017
One who posts a subtly obnoxious message to a newsgroup or message board under the guise of being humanitarian or altruistic. Some posts are carefully worded to guilt the reader into responding in a positive manner. It's a subtle form of trollism relying on making people feel uncomfortable without being direct. The mole's seemingly innocent/positive posts are often allowed to stay out of fear of offending them, or the "attack" is too borderline and so everyone lets it slide. They may post something that in another context is fine, but paired in a context where it does not belong, which is the only thing causing it to be inappropriate, rather than the more direct and obvious provocative tactics used by an internet troll.
A patchy grey puppy photo was posted into several internet Black Labrador Retriever fan groups. The text on the puppy picture said, "I am ugly, but can I get a like and a share?". Several people actually replied "to the puppy" directly and in empathy as if the puppy were the "person" posting, also disregarding that the breed didn't even belong in that group.
Another chronic mole was a member of a famous philosopher internet fan group. Rather than posting quotes from that philosopher, or ideas in sync with theirs, she was making up her own philosophical statements, the majority of which had no relation to, or were often in direct opposition to the tenets of the philosopher. Because her words are not blatantly combative or provocative, admins feel "coerced" not to ban her despite her departure from the intended support of the group subject.
Another chronic mole was a member of a famous philosopher internet fan group. Rather than posting quotes from that philosopher, or ideas in sync with theirs, she was making up her own philosophical statements, the majority of which had no relation to, or were often in direct opposition to the tenets of the philosopher. Because her words are not blatantly combative or provocative, admins feel "coerced" not to ban her despite her departure from the intended support of the group subject.
by Phoebe Figalilly August 17, 2018