Said in Agreement, Approval, Appreciation, or Acknowledgement during social or non-social situations
by TRIPLE.M August 29, 2025

1: A house full of poo/feces/shit
2: When something happens that you so fucking hate you wanna kill all the dicks involved in this shit
3: The World Cup
4: Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton
2: When something happens that you so fucking hate you wanna kill all the dicks involved in this shit
3: The World Cup
4: Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton
1: I drowned in the absolute shithouse
2: That dick sucking cock is so fucking absolute shithosue
3: So, how was the absolute shithouse?
4: Hey look, it’s a bunch of absolute shithouse (s) on the TV!
2: That dick sucking cock is so fucking absolute shithosue
3: So, how was the absolute shithouse?
4: Hey look, it’s a bunch of absolute shithouse (s) on the TV!
by Fitzionmedick November 20, 2021

When someone does absolutely ass on something (“Absolutely Killed it means you did well but adding “This is Dead” with it means that you did bad)
by ndotty_gzzzz March 9, 2025

A way of mildly offending someone without crossing any homophobic, racist, or inappropriate boundaries, usually meant light heartedly, but sometimes with harsh intent.
Used with the intent of being racist actually, and as a matter of fact, a lot of the time is meant to make someone hate their life, so yeah, have fun you bunch of gay cunts.
Used with the intent of being racist actually, and as a matter of fact, a lot of the time is meant to make someone hate their life, so yeah, have fun you bunch of gay cunts.
by Ryisanonce February 3, 2019

Absolute Capital - Slang compound word referring to high amounts of wealth usually owned by a person or a company, that often used to describe the amount of money someone is generating off of an action or product.
by NiggyNiggyMyNigga April 28, 2020

Similar to Ken Wilber's "Pre/trans fallacy", which is about conflating pre-rational views with trans-rational views, the Relative/absolute fallacy is about conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective. This is the main source of confusion in the forms of spirituality that deal with the implications of non-duality (Oneness).
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
You're conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective ("The Relative/Absolute Fallacy").
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
by Carich99 December 23, 2020

by Absolute-dd September 28, 2019
