Hym "So, if I haven't explained this before, there are 3 categories of 'Sentient
Meat.' There's Sentient
Meat (Me), Sentient
Meat (Not Me), and Sentient
Meat (Food). There are sub-categories but we
don't have to get into those. So, yeah... That's you. 'Sentient
Meat (Not Me).' Your status hierarchy is
like a pretend thing you guys are all doing. And I know what you're thinking 'Well then how does the non-existence of status relate to sexual selection?' And I would say, general attractiveness pairing, proximity, familial phenotypic similarities and positive association (Which is how you get shit
like SpongeBob guy or a general trend towards intraracial dating or groupies). So, now you're
like 'Well, what does that have to do with status or the lack thereof?' And I was getting to that part, shit-head. That would fall under 'Positive association.' Because you don't want to fuck actors you don't
like. Right? But their 'status' would be relatively the same, wouldn't it? Who would have the most status as an actor? The person with the most accolades? So, like Jack Nicholson and Denzel Washington? Morgan freeman? Or is hype
based?
Like whoever has the most hype at this moment has the most status? There's also some fat-cock involved. There's an underlying element of fat-cocks going on there too. But no. No status. I guess you could consider yourself 'sometimes food' as a status. Because as a 'Not Me' you situationally constitute a food-source. That can be your status."