Hym "So, if I haven't explained this before, there are 3 categories of 'Sentient Meat.' There's Sentient Meat (Me), Sentient Meat (Not Me), and Sentient Meat (
Food). There are sub-categories but we
don't have to get into those. So, yeah... That's you. 'Sentient Meat (Not Me).' Your status hierarchy is
like a pretend thing you guys are all doing. And I know what you're thinking 'Well then how does the non-existence of status relate to sexual selection?' And I would say, general attractiveness pairing, proximity, familial phenotypic similarities and positive association (Which is how you get shit
like SpongeBob guy or a general trend towards intraracial dating or groupies). So, now you're
like 'Well, what does that have to do with status or the lack thereof?' And I was getting to that part, shit-head. That would fall under 'Positive association.' Because you
don't want to
fuck actors you
don't
like. Right? But their 'status' would be relatively the same, wouldn't it? Who would have the most status as an actor? The person with the most accolades? So, like Jack Nicholson and Denzel Washington? Morgan freeman? Or is hype based? Like whoever has the most hype at this moment has the most status? There's also some
fat-cock involved. There's an underlying element of
fat-cocks going on there too. But no. No status. I guess you could consider yourself 'sometimes
food' as a status. Because as a 'Not Me' you situationally constitute a
food-source. That can be your status."