jobification

The practice of taking any character from a short story by Stephen King and
altering them into a cyberpunk type
character in order to make the new movie
more popular and as an excuse for the
presence of eye candy.

The central villain in Mangler II was
the victim of jobification.

by Miss Lulu November 8, 2003

jurisfiction

When there is no law, authority or mandate for a particular act however you're compelled through social norms, moral dogmas to consent.

his claim that I couldn't do that was based on pure jurisfiction.

by Tloveperth October 27, 2023

Justification against Victims of Capitalism

The direct argument that the harms suffered under capitalist systems—poverty, alienation, exploitation—are necessary, deserved, or noble. It frames victims as willing participants in a fair game (“they chose that job”), as beneficiaries of growth (“a rising tide lifts all boats”), or as unfortunate but acceptable casualties of progress and efficiency.

Justification against Victims of Capitalism Example: A politician arguing against a living wage by stating, “Low wages are what give young people the hunger to climb the ladder. Struggle builds character.” This justification against victims of capitalism transmutes systemic economic coercion into a moral virtue, suggesting that being underpaid is a beneficial rite of passage rather than exploitation.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Justification against Victims of Western Colonialism and Imperialism

The argument that the violence, extraction, and cultural destruction of colonialism were ultimately beneficial, necessary, or outweighed by introduced “gifts” like infrastructure, borders, or religion. It positions the victimized societies as primitive beneficiaries of Western intervention, framing conquest as salvation.

Justification against Victims of Western Colonialism and Imperialism Example: “Yes, the colonial period was harsh, but it ended tribal warfare and gave them modern states and Christianity.” This justification acknowledges harm only to immediately discount it by asserting a superior alternative was provided, framing the violence as a difficult but necessary education.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Justification against Victims of Neoliberalism

The explicit defense of policies—austerity, privatization, deregulation, financialization—that cause precarity and inequality, by arguing they create overall growth, discipline, and “flexibility.” Victims are portrayed as regrettable but necessary sacrifices to global competitiveness and fiscal responsibility.

Justification against Victims of Neoliberalism Example: “We had to privatize the water supply and raise rates to attract investment and ensure long-term efficiency. Yes, some can’t pay, but vouchers are available. The old system was unsustainable.” This justification frames a loss of a public good as a tough, responsible choice, painting victims as casualties of progress against backwardness.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Justification against Victims of Late-Stage Capitalism

The explicit defense of the extreme, often absurd, harms endemic to the decaying phase of capitalism—such as rampant financialization, platform monopolies, climate collapse, and existential precarity—as not only necessary but as signs of a thriving, innovative system. It frames unprecedented levels of inequality, burnout, and societal dysfunction as the exciting, if turbulent, frontier of human progress, where victims are merely those who failed to adapt to a new, faster world they should be grateful for.

Justification against Victims of Late-Stage Capitalism Example: A tech billionaire arguing that the mental health crisis and loneliness epidemic fueled by social media algorithms are "the price of global connection and democratized information," and that those suffering from addiction or misinformation "need to develop better digital literacy." This justification reframes the systemic pathologies of attention economics as a grand, neutral evolution, blaming users for its human costs.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Justification against Victims of Anti-communism

The direct argument that the persecution, violence, and human rights abuses committed in the name of combating communism—such as coups, death squads, blacklisting, and repression—were necessary, righteous, or defensive actions. It frames victims (union organizers, leftist intellectuals, peasant movements) as legitimate threats to national security, social order, or "the free world," whose suffering was a justified cost of preventing a greater totalitarian evil.

Justification against Victims of Anti-communism Example: Defending the CIA-backed overthrow of a democratically elected socialist president by arguing, "We had to stop a communist domino effect in the hemisphere. Sure, the dictatorship that followed was harsh, but it prevented a Cuba-style regime and saved the country from total Marxist tyranny." This justification explicitly endorses the violent suppression of a political alternative as a moral and strategic imperative.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026