prove the proof

A term commonly used on YouTube and social media. Meaning to not only prove your point to really prove it with hard proof. Edward Hubbard coined the term

You are lying prove the proof

by Frankoo January 3, 2019

Not having Proof

Not Having proof means youre stupid ass little nigga monkey

Not having Proof*
He he he haw

by Cloudy69420 April 3, 2022

not bullet proof

Nolan, Brayden, any opp who tries me

“ i’m telling brayden and nolan u were talking abt there girls” “they not bullet proof tho”

by wearenolanK June 30, 2022

Zero Knowledge Proof

My Existence.

You see that guy over there? Now that's real Zero Knowledge Proof

by babla13579 April 4, 2023

Zero Knowledge Proof

Doing something that proves that you have zero knowledge.

"That guy just told me he believes $BTC is going to the moon".

"Bruh! $BTC is going to zero. He just showed you he's an idiot. That's what you call a zero knowledge proof."

by fooledbyrandomness69 December 4, 2023

Hard Problem of Proof

The philosophical and practical impossibility of providing evidence so absolute and universally acceptable that it compels belief in all rational observers, especially in social, ethical, or historical domains. What constitutes "proof" is itself a contested cultural construct, and the demand for impossible, frictionless proof is often a disingenuous tactic to maintain skepticism.

Example: Proving systemic racism. You can provide statistics on sentencing disparities, historical records, personal testimonies, and sociological studies. A skeptic will dismiss each as "correlation not causation," "anecdotal," "biased," or "theoretical." The Hard Problem of Proof is that no evidence can penetrate a worldview that redefines proof itself to preserve its assumptions.

by Dumuabzu February 8, 2026

Arbitrary Burden of Proof

The meta-fallacy where one side is forced to prove every assertion, back every claim, and satisfy every demand for evidence, while the other side can simply move goalposts, demand new sources, dismiss evidence as insufficient, and never provide anything themselves. The arbitrary burden of proof is the debate equivalent of one person carrying a piano while the other skips ahead, occasionally turning around to complain that the piano-carrier isn't keeping up. It's how conspiracy theorists can demand that scientists prove negatives (prove that vaccines don't cause autism, prove that the moon landing wasn't fake), while offering no proof for their own claims and dismissing any evidence against them as part of the conspiracy.

Example: "She was trapped under an arbitrary burden of proof. Every time she provided a source, he moved the sourcepost. Every time she met his standard, he raised it. After two hours, she'd provided twenty sources, and he'd provided zero. When she asked what he believed, he said 'I'm just asking questions.' The questions were infinite, the answers were never enough, and the burden was hers alone."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026