Scorched Earth Fallacy

A severe form of Poisoning the Well where, after identifying a single flaw, mistake, or morally questionable association in an opponent's past, one declares their entire intellectual landscape barren and uninhabitable. No argument they ever present, past or future, can be valid because the ground has been "scorched" by their earlier transgression. It is a totalizing dismissal that seeks to burn down the person's entire credibility permanently.

Example: "You admitted you voted for that corrupt mayor ten years ago? That's it. I'm deploying the scorched earth fallacy on you. Nothing you ever say about politics, economics, or even the weather can be trusted. Your judgment is eternally compromised." One past action is used to justify rejecting all future contributions.

by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026

Informational Fallacy

The fallacious belief that only that which can be quantified, digitally encoded, or formally computed is "real" or constitutes valid knowledge. It dismisses qualitative experiences, subjective consciousness, moral intuitions, and analog phenomena as "illusions" or "epiphenomena" because they cannot be fully captured in a discrete, measurable data stream. It's a form of extreme reductionism that mistakes the map (the informational model) for the territory (lived reality).

Example: "Love is just a biochemical algorithm for gene propagation. If you can't model it in a neural network or measure it in serotonin levels, it's not a real phenomenon, just a story we tell." This statement commits the Informational Fallacy by asserting that the computable aspect is the only reality, reducing a rich human experience to mere data processing.

by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026

Mainstream Media Fallacy

The erroneous assumption that ideas, aesthetics, or opinions are inherently superior, correct, or more "authentic" simply because they are amplified by or aligned with dominant cultural institutions (corporate news, major studios, popular influencers). It conflates prevalence with validity, market share with truth. Conversely, it can also manifest as the inverse snobbery of automatically rejecting anything mainstream, but the core fallacy is granting automatic epistemic authority based solely on broadcast reach.

Example: "You think that indie theory holds water? Please. It's not on CNN or the NYT Bestseller list. If it was really important, it'd be everywhere—that's just the Mainstream Media Fallacy in reverse." This implies truth is democratically determined by airtime and that marginality, in either direction, is a marker of falsehood.

by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026

Fallacy of Rationalization

The psychological and rhetorical maneuver of constructing superficially reasonable-sounding excuses or justifications for regressive, harmful, or morally reprehensible positions, particularly those that advocate for a return to oppressive historical systems or the acceptance of civilizational backsliding. This fallacy uses the language of reason—practicality, economic benefit, cultural tradition, or flawed historical analogy—to dress up a conclusion rooted in prejudice, fear, or power dynamics. It's not true reasoning; it's a post-hoc salvage operation for an indefensible stance, seeking to retrofit logic onto bigotry or oppression. The tell is that the "rationale" always serves to excuse suffering or inequality.

Example: Arguing for the return of exploitative child labor by saying "It teaches them discipline and helps poor families earn money" commits the Fallacy of Rationalization. It uses a veneer of pragmatic economic concern to justify a brutal practice society rightly outlawed. Similarly, defending colonial atrocities with "It brought infrastructure and modern government" rationalizes genocide and plunder by cherry-picking secondary outcomes while ignoring the primary moral catastrophe.

by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026

Fallacy of Logification

The more formal and structurally deceptive cousin of rationalization. This fallacy involves constructing a rigid, self-contained logical framework—complete with axioms, definitions, and syllogisms—to systematically defend barbarism, injustice, or civilizational regression. Where rationalization makes excuses, logification builds a pseudo-philosophical system. It uses the tools of logic (deduction, categorization, consistency) but begins with poisoned premises (e.g., "some races are inherently less capable," "autocracy is more efficient") or willfully ignores vast human costs as "externalities." It is logic in service of inhumanity, creating a chilling, academic-sounding defense of the unthinkable.

Example: A Fallacy of Logification would be a tightly-argued essay "proving" the necessity of slavery using economic models that define human beings as capital assets, demographic theories about societal stability, and philosophical appeals to a "natural hierarchy." The logic is internally consistent within its own warped frame, but the frame itself is morally bankrupt. It uses the form of reasoned discourse to launder the content of atrocity, making evil look like an intellectual conclusion rather than a violent choice.

by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026

TINA Fallacy

The rhetorical and ideological maneuver of declaring that the current system, policy, or state of affairs—however flawed, oppressive, or unstable—is the only possible one, thereby shutting down all debate, imagination, and political will for change. Coined from Margaret Thatcher's famous dictum "There Is No Alternative" to neoliberal capitalism, this fallacy conflates the currently dominant model with the only conceivable model. It's a form of ideological coercion that frames critique as naive, reform as impossible, and collapse as preferable to transformation. It mistakes political inertia for natural law, serving those in power by making their rule seem inevitable.

TINA Fallacy Example: A politician facing calls for a nationalized healthcare system responds, "Private insurance is the only system that works. TINA. Any other idea is a fantasy that would destroy quality and innovation." This fallacy dismisses the proven models of dozens of other nations as irrelevant, presenting the status quo not as a choice but as a force of nature, paralyzing public discourse.

by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026

Best System Ever Fallacy

A rhetorical move that misuses a celebrated quote—often Winston Churchill’s “democracy is the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have been tried”—to argue that the current dominant system is not only the best available option, but is effectively beyond critique or meaningful improvement. The fallacy twists a pragmatic, relative defense (“least bad”) into an absolute, defensive dogma (“good enough forever”). It smugly dismisses calls for reform, innovation, or transformation by framing all alternatives as historically disproven, ignoring that the quote itself acknowledges the system’s flaws and leaves the door open for new ideas “to be tried.” It’s complacency disguised as wisdom.

Example: In a debate about implementing proportional representation to fix a dysfunctional two-party system, someone retorts, “Churchill already settled this: democracy is the worst system except for all the others. So quit complaining.” This invokes the Best System Ever Fallacy—using a famous caveat about imperfection to shut down specific improvements, as if Churchill’s line was a full stop on political evolution rather than a humble observation.

by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026