Skip to main content

prejudased

Arbitrarily closed-minded with regards to thinking that everyone is out to get you.
It is indeed wise to be appropriately cautious about initially trusting a stranger or newcomer in your life, but it's a mistake to be overly prejudased, either.
by QuacksO August 20, 2024
mugGet the prejudased mug.

Prejudicial Logic

Logic that is shaped by prejudice from the start—reasoning that begins with biased assumptions and uses logical form to give those assumptions the appearance of validity. Prejudicial Logic isn't illogical; it's logical within its biased frame. The problem isn't the reasoning—it's the premises, which already contain the prejudice. The logic then functions to make the prejudice seem reasoned, to give bias the cover of rationality.
"They constructed a perfectly valid syllogism: all members of group X are lazy; this person is from group X; therefore this person is lazy. That's Prejudicial Logic—logical in form, prejudicial in content. The logic isn't the problem; the premise is. But the logical form makes the prejudice look like reason."
by Dumu The Void February 28, 2026
mugGet the Prejudicial Logic mug.

Prejaculate

To accidentally ejaculate before a contest to see who can ejaculate the fastest.
Dude, I was going to this "Fastest Gooner" competition, but I prejaculated.
by GeorgeCorn October 4, 2025
mugGet the Prejaculate mug.

Atheist Prejudice

A form of atheist bigotry characterized by pre‑judging individuals based on their religious, spiritual, or metaphysical affiliations, often assuming they are intellectually deficient, emotionally weak, or morally compromised. It manifests in dismissive labels (“she’s a woo‑woo,” “he’s a Bible thumper”), in assumptions tExample: “When she mentioned she practiced meditation rooted in Buddhist tradition, he immediately dismissed her professional competence—atheist prejudice, assuming spirituality precluded intelligence.”hat believers cannot be scientists or critical thinkers, and in the automatic attribution of any disagreement to the other’s “irrationality.” Atheist prejudice operates as a cognitive shortcut that allows the prejudiced person to avoid engaging with the actual person and their views.
Example: “When she mentioned she practiced meditation rooted in Buddhist tradition, he immediately dismissed her professional competence—atheist prejudice, assuming spirituality precluded intelligence.”
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 25, 2026
mugGet the Atheist Prejudice mug.

Proof Prejudice

A milder but still harmful form of Proof Bigotry, characterized by a reflexive tendency to dismiss any claim that is not accompanied by “proof” as defined by the prejudiced person, without examining whether proof is needed or what form it might take. Proof prejudice operates as a cognitive shortcut: if the speaker cannot immediately produce the type of evidence demanded, their entire position is automatically invalid. Unlike proof bigotry, it may not be accompanied by active harassment, but it still closes down inquiry and silences perspectives that do not conform to a narrow evidentiary standard.
Example: “When she mentioned her grandmother’s herbal remedies, he scoffed ‘prove it works.’ He didn’t ask about context or tradition—proof prejudice, dismissing non‑Western knowledge for failing a test it was never designed to pass.”
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 25, 2026
mugGet the Proof Prejudice mug.

Evidence Prejudice

The cognitive bias underlying Evidence Bigotry: a reflexive dismissal of any claim not accompanied by evidence in the form preferred by the prejudiced person, combined with a willingness to attribute the lack of such evidence to the claimant’s intellectual or mental deficiency. Evidence prejudice often operates automatically, without conscious malice—but its effects are silencing. It treats absence of double‑blind studies as proof of fraud, and it equates “not yet measured” with “unreal.” It is especially common in debates about spirituality, indigenous knowledge, and experiential claims.
Example: “He heard ‘energy healing’ and immediately said ‘that’s pseudoscience, there’s no evidence.’ He never asked what kind of evidence might be appropriate—evidence prejudice, dismissing a practice because it didn’t fit his evidentiary template.”
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 25, 2026
mugGet the Evidence Prejudice mug.

Share this definition

Sign in to vote

We'll email you a link to sign in instantly.

Or

Check your email

We sent a link to

Open your email