Imposing the sexual expectation of your agenda for the betterment of your field of work or mutual monetary take over or personal gain between to consensual oppositions , coming together for the purpose of a strengthening company , entity or individual
No matter what area of big business one is in, congical economics is prevalent , especially when one or both sides are are on their 3rd marriage and or divorce.
by Adolph Leery May 05, 2022
a woman with an economics major is probably a huge bitch with an anti social personality and is very incapable of love. she is very pretty but very much a horrible person. its not because she can make her own choices, its because shes hurting people with them. they may be the money making machine, but she wont get a boyfriend because with all the money she has earned with whatever business she starts with that bachelor she wont need one
by The Big Apple on Yik Yak November 22, 2021
Stealing money via force though voting in corrupt politicians. Any type of Socialist. Nazi (National Socialists), Communists, Democrats, Neocons, Corporatists, Progressives. Harris/Walz supporters. A main reason for Democide. Usually people who support the cool or hip political movement other than understanding history and economics.
by theifinthenight August 18, 2024
Summary: AI will specifically destroy jobs created by computers in the first place, preserving 'offline' jobs, while minimally impacting work quality, and preserving gross productivity.
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
"I'm a USPS door delivery mailman, so, according to West's Theory Of Specific Economic Destruction, my job delivering mail should be fine even if the Postal Service grows more efficient at correctly routing addresses and scheduling delivery drivers."
by Zack West February 18, 2024
by Longboyy February 10, 2024
by Dufotue December 03, 2023
Unbridled greed.
by BainDrainsYouDry January 13, 2012