Theory of Power Groups

A mainstream sociological concept stating that in any complex society, power is not held by a single entity (the state) or the masses, but is contested and exercised by a plurality of competing groups: corporations, unions, professional associations, NGOs, media conglomerates, and religious institutions. Politics is the process of temporary alliances and conflicts between these groups. It’s pluralism, but where the playing field is not level and some groups have vastly more resources.

Example: Environmental policy in a country is not set just by the government. According to the Theory of Power Groups, it's the outcome of a brutal lobbying war between the fossil fuel industry group, the renewable energy trade association, environmental NGOs, and utility unions, each pulling on different levers of power within the legislature, courts, and media.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Roomthinking / Room Groupthinking

The hyper-specific, situational groupthink that emerges spontaneously within a single physical meeting or gathering, dictated by the immediate power dynamics, unspoken social cues, and emotional temperature of that specific "room." It’s the pressure to conform to the vibe right now, whether it's a boardroom requiring unanimous optimism, a classroom where the teacher's favorite student sets the opinion, or a party where dissent would kill the mood. The thinking is not about ideology or profession, but about maintaining the social integrity of the temporary micro-collective.

Roomthinking / Room Groupthinking Example: In a tense executive meeting where the CEO has staked their reputation on a failing project, Roomthinking takes hold. Even managers with private doubts nod along to the CEO's unrealistic salvage plan. To voice skepticism would break the room's fragile consensus and mark them as disloyal. The decision—obviously bad to any outside observer—becomes the group's truth for the duration of the meeting, driven purely by the social physics of that specific space.

by Dumuabzu February 5, 2026

Lawothinking / Law Groupthinking

A broader cultural variant of legal groupthink that extends beyond professionals to a society that comes to venerate The Law as an infallible, almost sacred system. This mindset conflates "legal" with "right," assumes complexity signifies wisdom, and treats any critique of the legal system as naive or anarchic. It creates a populace that accepts unjust outcomes because "the process was followed," and distrusts extra-legal forms of justice or community problem-solving. The law is not seen as a human tool, but as a natural force whose dictates must be obeyed without question.

Lawothinking / Law Groupthinking *Example: When a person is evicted due to an obscure clause in a 50-page lease they couldn't understand, public reaction shaped by Lawothinking is: "It's a contract; they should have read it. The law is the law." This groupthink dismisses the power imbalance and predatory nature of the contract, framing the issue solely as one of individual responsibility within a neutral legal framework, thus absolving the system of critique.*

by Dumuabzu February 5, 2026

Legalothinking / Legal Groupthinking

The professional and institutional groupthink endemic to legal communities, where adherence to procedural formalism, precedent, and adversarial tactics overrides considerations of justice, ethics, or common sense. This mindset enforces a shared language and logic that can seem alien to outsiders, prioritizing "winning" within the rules of the game over achieving a fair or sensible outcome. It creates a collective blind spot where legal professionals—judges, lawyers, clerks—can unanimously agree on a course of action that is legally coherent but morally absurd or socially destructive, as the framework of the law itself becomes the only permissible reality.

Legalothinking / Legal Groupthinking Example: In a corporate law firm, a team debates how to help a client avoid environmental liability. Legalothinking takes over: they spend hours strategizing on jurisdictional loopholes and procedural delays, all while tacitly agreeing not to question the client's destructive practices. The shared goal becomes crafting the most technically defensible argument, not preventing environmental harm. The group's moral compass is recalibrated to point only toward legal victory.

by Dumuabzu February 5, 2026

The Boys Groupchat

A bunch of stinky and smelly losers, who masturbate on calls together and t-poses in a giant circle. They generally are very unoriginal.

Heh John you seem like you would reside in the Boys Groupchat

by Brodie Ernst April 14, 2025

Schrödinger's groupchat

A groupchat that is either very active or inactive on a complete random basis. You have no clue if the groupchat has a lot or few messages until you open the app/groupchat.

"This groupchat is so inconsistent. One time it has hundreds of messages and another time it's completely dead."
"Yeah, it's basically Schrödinger's groupchat."

by DutchPolarBear December 26, 2025

Theory of Concrete and Imaginary Groups

A micro-sociological counterpart focused on smaller collectives. A Concrete Group is defined by observable, functional interaction for a common goal: a project team, a sports team, a study group. An Imaginary Group is a category imposed by outsiders or adopted as identity, where members may not interact but are lumped together by a perceived trait: "Gen Z," "suburban voters," "the 1%." The theory analyzes how being placed into an "imaginary group" can lead to stereotyping, political mobilization, or the internalization of an assigned identity.

Theory of Concrete and Imaginary Groups Example: Your weekly basketball squad is a Concrete Group; roles, performance, and interpersonal dynamics are clear. In contrast, "Influencers" or "Karens" are Imaginary Groups. These are labels applied to disparate individuals who share a few perceived behaviors. The power of the label, however, can be concrete—affecting job prospects, social treatment, and online harassment—showing how imaginary categorization creates real-world consequences.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 6, 2026