Relative-Humidity (Rel-a-tiv Hue-mid-uh-Tee)
1. noun the amount of water vapor present in air expressed as a percentage of the amount needed for saturation at the same temperature.
2. adjective the measurement of saturation that is greater than or equivalent to the sweat you are profusely precipitating from your ball sack expressed as an percentage in your cousins ass where it has accumulated
1. noun the amount of water vapor present in air expressed as a percentage of the amount needed for saturation at the same temperature.
2. adjective the measurement of saturation that is greater than or equivalent to the sweat you are profusely precipitating from your ball sack expressed as an percentage in your cousins ass where it has accumulated
1. (e.g.: The Alabama weather man said "Cross state you gonna see a hella-high chance of hunded pa cent Relative-humidity.")
2. (e.g.: The Alabama weather man said "Cross state you gonna see a hella-high chance of hunded pa cent Relative-humidity.")
Roll Tide
2. (e.g.: The Alabama weather man said "Cross state you gonna see a hella-high chance of hunded pa cent Relative-humidity.")
Roll Tide
by Christopher Durnsy September 10, 2023
Get the Relative-Humidity mug.A poor relative is someone you try to make look like a poor person so that your other relatives can live lavish lifestyles.I..e no divorce, 3 course meals for breakfast lunch and dinner, drive luxury cares, own mansions, gamble at the casinos every month. It is actually not really acceptable. and pretty low and scummy.
Lets call someone our poor relative in hopes that we become more successful.{ I am not your poor relative}
by Alex phoenix October 3, 2023
Get the Poor Relative mug.Similar to Ken Wilber's "Pre/trans fallacy", which is about conflating pre-rational views with trans-rational views, the Relative/absolute fallacy is about conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective. This is the main source of confusion in the forms of spirituality that deal with the implications of non-duality (Oneness).
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
You're conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective ("The Relative/Absolute Fallacy").
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
by Carich99 December 23, 2020
Get the The Relative/absolute fallacy mug.by anonymous November 12, 2020
Get the Rel mug.by anonymous November 12, 2020
Get the Rel mug.A mooching family-member who uses reverse-nepotism (i.e., instead of Person A's extending undeserved favors to Person B just because Person B is related to him, Person B pressures Person A to excessively favor him due to family ties) in an attempt to get you to purchase non-vital items for him.
Ethan Couch's parents were way too indulgent of him financially, and so he became a totally spoiled brat who expected ALL fellow humans to cater to his wishes, whether they were his buyological relatives or not.
by QuacksO November 15, 2020
Get the buyological relative mug.samekichi (aka rel) is the most handsome, awesome, beautiful, stunning man to ever fucking exist 🙏🙏 💋💋💋
by samekichiworshipper420 March 9, 2021
Get the rel ❤️ mug.