One metric fuckton is equal to 7 billion and 10 million tons or 1.402e+13 pounds. This is calculated by haveing a metric fuckton be equal to 10 duck loads and 1 fuckload being equal to the population of china, which is 1.402 billion.
Joe: Man I have a Metric Fuckton of laundry to do today
Siri: One Metric Fuckton is equal to 1.402e+13 pounds
Joe: Your mom weighs 1.402e+13 pounds
Siri: One Metric Fuckton is equal to 1.402e+13 pounds
Joe: Your mom weighs 1.402e+13 pounds
by Your mother is 1.402e+13 lbs August 18, 2022
A metric fuck ton it worth about double a shit ton give or take. Used when describing something of mass quantity.
Bad: damn man I pulled my back I was lifting a metric fuck ton
Good: damn man I pulled this guys back when he was lifting me up I weigh a metric fuck ton
Good: damn man I pulled this guys back when he was lifting me up I weigh a metric fuck ton
by Melk Man February 12, 2019
by Duckenheim April 06, 2020
Why do you think using British Imperial measurements makes you free? If you give them a metric inch, they'll take a kilometre.
by Jaymax February 20, 2022
Facts and figures presented in a manner to force people to a specific conclusion vice forming their own opinion.
by Shputz August 19, 2011
I can't get a job at the hospital here, this is a college town and there's a metric shitload of pre-med students applying there.
by theOneandOnlyNightHawk May 10, 2018
Use of a mathematical model in the English language.
It is customary to write items in a series with required articles. For example, we write 'a book, a pen, a rubber and a bag'. Mathematically speaking, the article 'a' is common to all the items. So put in a mathematical format, it would be like 'a (book, pen, rubber and bag)' and would be 'a book, pen, rubber and bag' with the removal of brackets/parentheses. (However, mathematics does not allow this.) Both expressions are acceptable.
Suppose we write 'a book, a pen, an erasure and a bag'. Here, the article 'a' cannot be taken as a common factor because there is 'an' before 'erasure'. So it would be wrong to say 'a book, pen, erasure and bag'.
It is customary to write items in a series with required articles. For example, we write 'a book, a pen, a rubber and a bag'. Mathematically speaking, the article 'a' is common to all the items. So put in a mathematical format, it would be like 'a (book, pen, rubber and bag)' and would be 'a book, pen, rubber and bag' with the removal of brackets/parentheses. (However, mathematics does not allow this.) Both expressions are acceptable.
Suppose we write 'a book, a pen, an erasure and a bag'. Here, the article 'a' cannot be taken as a common factor because there is 'an' before 'erasure'. So it would be wrong to say 'a book, pen, erasure and bag'.
by Uttam Maharjan 2 October 25, 2020