A platoon of unscrupulous rapscallions who pass all the racial, sexual, prejudicial slur definitions under the sun, yet have a fetish for rejecting actual legitimate definitions which were made to educate the common reader.
They adore and often get themselves off to definitions of poor grammar which involve angst-ridden prepubescent teenage girls ranting about how apparently bad their ex-boyfriend was.
They however despise any definitions which contain actual informative content with long descriptive paragraphs and words that their sprocket-sized brains have never processed before.
If you're thinking about posting a definition just keep this info in mind.
They adore and often get themselves off to definitions of poor grammar which involve angst-ridden prepubescent teenage girls ranting about how apparently bad their ex-boyfriend was.
They however despise any definitions which contain actual informative content with long descriptive paragraphs and words that their sprocket-sized brains have never processed before.
If you're thinking about posting a definition just keep this info in mind.
"OH GEE, LOOKS LIKE I'LL HAVE TO REJECT THIS BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT A RAPSCALLION IS SJFHDSLJFHDSLJHFJLDSHFLJDS"
"omg dis iz 2 lon i dun wan 2 reded dis, rjectd!!!111! >>>>:(((( ddfidsiufhdusoi"
Also here's "Urbandictionary editors" because I apparently need to place it in the example section for some discernible reason.
"omg dis iz 2 lon i dun wan 2 reded dis, rjectd!!!111! >>>>:(((( ddfidsiufhdusoi"
Also here's "Urbandictionary editors" because I apparently need to place it in the example section for some discernible reason.
by Weaselcake June 20, 2013
Internet users of questionable intelligence, who have the habit of rejecting completely legitimate definitions while accepting nonsense.
I signed up to be one of the urbandictionary editors but quickly ignored the job when I felt my IQ dropping by the second.
by MC Fred July 13, 2006
1) A troup of anonymous dodo birds with the IQ of 3, who always reject the proper definitions, and let the abbusive and ignorant definitions be put onto the website.
2) Total bird-brained people who keep rejecting my definitions.
3) This definition would probably be rejected by them, as well
4) Constantly keep their mouse arrow hoovered on top of any definition, to immediatley reject it.
2) Total bird-brained people who keep rejecting my definitions.
3) This definition would probably be rejected by them, as well
4) Constantly keep their mouse arrow hoovered on top of any definition, to immediatley reject it.
by Hjselfieco January 28, 2015
1) A group of more-or-less anonymous people who are pretty much the only line of defense for this site to prevent it from being totally abused. They are pretty much the only thing between you and about 50 million explicit, pornographic, abusive, misogynistic, racist, or just plain stupid entries.
Editors have specific guidelines they must follow. However, these are often vague (especially if it's hard to tell, for example, if a term is just explaining a racial slur, or if it is in fact racist).
If your definition doesn't get published, it could be for one of two reasons:
A) It wasn't that good or
B) Someone just didn't like it for some reason.
In that case, try again...
However, bitching about them probably won't help.
Editors have specific guidelines they must follow. However, these are often vague (especially if it's hard to tell, for example, if a term is just explaining a racial slur, or if it is in fact racist).
If your definition doesn't get published, it could be for one of two reasons:
A) It wasn't that good or
B) Someone just didn't like it for some reason.
In that case, try again...
However, bitching about them probably won't help.
1)Person: "OMG! Those evil facist urbandictionary editors rejected my entry! They suck!!!!"
Other person: "Get a life."
Other person: "Get a life."
by andriod5 March 25, 2006
a) One who reads Urbandictionary.com altogether too often b) Some loser who feels the need to insult people or vent their anger on Urbandictionary.com
by Jon January 16, 2004
when trying to define a word and never getting a single approval on any word i have created is called urbandictionary bias. When the judge sees that every term i have added gets rejected no matter what i say has been denied on here, its called urbandictionary bias.
When i finally get approved i will have so much documentation that i will prove urbandictionary bias by showing the judge emails of nothing ever being approved, yet lots of articles that have to do with smoking pot get approved. This is defined as urbandictionary bias. The editor that rejects this addition to the dictionary will have to answer why they wont approve even a legitimate word like gravponics even though gravponics is a portmanteau.
by doublestandarddems April 19, 2013
by Tehmightysheep(again) January 06, 2010