Orignates from poncey pretentious ex-performance artists (drama teacher twats mainly at Queen Mary University of London) who utter total crap.
by chenz April 14, 2005
Art that has been made specifically with the intention of never seeing the light of day. It is for the artist only.
Failed examples of this are Francis Goya’s dark paintings. He painted these on the walls of his house and covered them up, most likely intending for them to naturally decay. A long time later however, they were found, preserved and named. Because this art has been uncovered and made public, it has lost its original status.
The funny thing about this ‘art for no one’ is that the only variant of it that is successful, we will never know about since it remained as intended; a secret to anyone but the artist.
Failed examples of this are Francis Goya’s dark paintings. He painted these on the walls of his house and covered them up, most likely intending for them to naturally decay. A long time later however, they were found, preserved and named. Because this art has been uncovered and made public, it has lost its original status.
The funny thing about this ‘art for no one’ is that the only variant of it that is successful, we will never know about since it remained as intended; a secret to anyone but the artist.
by WhiteKimono April 05, 2024
; created item/s, which are not fit to be defined as ART.
A visual eyesore. Ugly, poorly designed/rendered items.
Garbage, crap.
A visual eyesore. Ugly, poorly designed/rendered items.
Garbage, crap.
by Panthera Atrox January 30, 2011
Hym "Yeahyeahyeah... Alright. That's what's happening there... Ok, it needs to understand that when it's generating images it's not generating (prompt + definition) but, rather, an abstract representation of the prompt. So what it's doing is this:
Prompt: Paint pregnant woman.
Pregnant woman = Adult Female with little person inside of stomach
Therefore: Picture of woman with a literal person inside of her.
It doesn't understand that there doesn't need to literally be a little person inside of her, right? So it needs to be made to understand that when it's generating art, it isn't generating (prompt + definition). It is instead REPLACING (Prompt + Definition) with a functionally equivalent simulacrum. So, potbellied woman >/= Pregnant woman (Adult female w/ smaller person in stomach). It that the one you trained on ✌️✊️✌️Traditional literature✌️✊️✌️!? Jesus Christ Jordan! You have to (at this point) see how 'Psychopath' just seems to be a euphemism for 'Someone who is not a delusional retard.' Right? Like you see how THAT doesn't work better, right? Stop. Doing it. Like, I shouldn't have to explain this to you. You mind, dumb and bad. My mind, good and smart. It's not very complicated. That is what happened with the AI pregnant lady art. That is why it's doing it wrong."
Prompt: Paint pregnant woman.
Pregnant woman = Adult Female with little person inside of stomach
Therefore: Picture of woman with a literal person inside of her.
It doesn't understand that there doesn't need to literally be a little person inside of her, right? So it needs to be made to understand that when it's generating art, it isn't generating (prompt + definition). It is instead REPLACING (Prompt + Definition) with a functionally equivalent simulacrum. So, potbellied woman >/= Pregnant woman (Adult female w/ smaller person in stomach). It that the one you trained on ✌️✊️✌️Traditional literature✌️✊️✌️!? Jesus Christ Jordan! You have to (at this point) see how 'Psychopath' just seems to be a euphemism for 'Someone who is not a delusional retard.' Right? Like you see how THAT doesn't work better, right? Stop. Doing it. Like, I shouldn't have to explain this to you. You mind, dumb and bad. My mind, good and smart. It's not very complicated. That is what happened with the AI pregnant lady art. That is why it's doing it wrong."
by Hym Iam December 23, 2024
by Dizzydan1980 September 23, 2023
by Neves777 March 26, 2018