by freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeda October 21, 2008
Get the freda mug.definition: frontman of the possibly dyslexic band 'Limp Bizkit'(sic.)
defining characteristics: red cap, baggy trousers, angry, loud, bit of a muthafucker
comment: Fred Durst really isn't that bad of a guy, a mon avis. I in fact admire his 'don't give a fuck' attitude, and believe it or not, don't think he actually takes himself as seriously as a lot of other definitions seem to imply. At the end of the day, some people must like him and his L.I.M.P chums, cos he's bloody rich and gets to pimp around in a Bentley all day. fair play to the lad.
defining characteristics: red cap, baggy trousers, angry, loud, bit of a muthafucker
comment: Fred Durst really isn't that bad of a guy, a mon avis. I in fact admire his 'don't give a fuck' attitude, and believe it or not, don't think he actually takes himself as seriously as a lot of other definitions seem to imply. At the end of the day, some people must like him and his L.I.M.P chums, cos he's bloody rich and gets to pimp around in a Bentley all day. fair play to the lad.
1.Yorkshire Man: i fookin' hate Fred Durst, he's wank.
Open Minded music fan: hey mate, check yourself before you wreck yourself. muthafucker...
2. Fred Durst gets a rap from his critics.
3. Fred Durst is f-ilarious.
4. Some of Fred Durst's lyrics have to be heard to be believed.
Open Minded music fan: hey mate, check yourself before you wreck yourself. muthafucker...
2. Fred Durst gets a rap from his critics.
3. Fred Durst is f-ilarious.
4. Some of Fred Durst's lyrics have to be heard to be believed.
by Boxman July 26, 2004
Get the fred durst mug.Related Words
fried • fried chicken • fried eggs • fried-rice • Friedrich • frieda • Fried Gold • fried-man • fried-out • fried pickle
by faried May 30, 2003
Get the faried mug.noun: railroad acronym for "Flashing Rear End Device", the "black box" attached to the rear of most freight trains in the US since the 1980's, replacing the caboose.
Officially known as an End of Train Device (EOT), this is attached to the rear coupler and air brake line of the last car on the train. The device incorporates a pressure sensor and a radio to transmit brake line air pressure back to the lead locomotive, and a flashing red light to serve as a warning marker to other trains at night.
Also referred to in less complimentary terms as a "Fucking Rear End Device", due to the fact that early versions were heavy, cumbersome to handle, and not known to be especially reliable.
Officially known as an End of Train Device (EOT), this is attached to the rear coupler and air brake line of the last car on the train. The device incorporates a pressure sensor and a radio to transmit brake line air pressure back to the lead locomotive, and a flashing red light to serve as a warning marker to other trains at night.
Also referred to in less complimentary terms as a "Fucking Rear End Device", due to the fact that early versions were heavy, cumbersome to handle, and not known to be especially reliable.
"FRED is telling us we have no air. Either we broke the train in two (uncoupled cars or broke a coupler knuckle, which would disconnect an air line) or somebody closed an angle cock (valve that supplies air pressure to individual car brakes)."
by speedstan March 1, 2010
Get the FRED mug.derived from two words;'Freda' and 'licious':
'freda' - A beautiful maiden who possesses charm, grace, intelligence, and personality more than any other; -also: being in a state of free aura and centered chi.
'licious' - done very well almost excessively so; the best; the most tasty; with great prowess.
'freda' - A beautiful maiden who possesses charm, grace, intelligence, and personality more than any other; -also: being in a state of free aura and centered chi.
'licious' - done very well almost excessively so; the best; the most tasty; with great prowess.
the fictional, non-existent, word "chairdrobe" made it on urban dictionary, why can't 'fredalicious' ?
Fredalicious is an actual word rather than a definition that is just made into a word that is fictional and non-existent.
Oh wait, urban dictionary has never heard of 'fredalicious', so it can't be a word, because urban dictionary knows every word from every region. Like duh?! Isn't that the whole point of submitted Urban Words here, so that everyone can know what they mean where-ever they are, rather only words that you will only hear in butt-fuck America?
Marilyn Monroe is ' fredalicious ' .
Oh god, she is so oomph, she makes me feel excited and emptied, as if my being was drawn right out of me to her; that's ' fredalicious ' !
Fredalicious is an actual word rather than a definition that is just made into a word that is fictional and non-existent.
Oh wait, urban dictionary has never heard of 'fredalicious', so it can't be a word, because urban dictionary knows every word from every region. Like duh?! Isn't that the whole point of submitted Urban Words here, so that everyone can know what they mean where-ever they are, rather only words that you will only hear in butt-fuck America?
Marilyn Monroe is ' fredalicious ' .
Oh god, she is so oomph, she makes me feel excited and emptied, as if my being was drawn right out of me to her; that's ' fredalicious ' !
by thegabriel October 4, 2008
Get the Fredalicious mug.A length of time nominally lasting six months.
The phrase is used to mock New York Times columnist Tom Friedman, who has repeatedly stated that (paraphrase) "the next six months in Iraq should determine the outcome of the US operation there." Fair.org shows Friedman making statements to that effect in Nov 03, Jun 04, Oct 04, Nov 04, Sep 05, etc.
The phrase is used to mock New York Times columnist Tom Friedman, who has repeatedly stated that (paraphrase) "the next six months in Iraq should determine the outcome of the US operation there." Fair.org shows Friedman making statements to that effect in Nov 03, Jun 04, Oct 04, Nov 04, Sep 05, etc.
by PsuedoNoise July 11, 2006
Get the Friedman mug.An absolute brilliant German philosopher that is often overlooked, overshadowed, underappreciated and/or completely misunderstood. He could deconstruct logical aspects of human concepts that would blow your mind. Even people like Albert Einstein or Rene Descartes would never win; in an argument against Nietzsche. At least, according to Nietzsche's train of thought and his natural strict logic composition; in regards to metaphysics.
Rene Descartes always focuses on "essence" and "truth"; while Nietzsche argues that essence and truth are not real and are only ideas or figments of illusions in our conscious minds. Nietzsche focuses on the subconscious; while Descartes focuses on the conscious mind. "I think, therefore I am."
Nietzsche: You do not "think"!!. You only "believe" that "you think". Your brain is an organ struggling for life, just like your heart, liver, kidneys and everything else!
Descartes: I do not understand what you are saying, Nietzsche!
Nietzsche: You have missed the big picture entirely and focused on the irrelevant, simple matters.
Descartes: I still don't think I hear you!
Nietzsche: Likewise.
Rene Descartes always focuses on "essence" and "truth"; while Nietzsche argues that essence and truth are not real and are only ideas or figments of illusions in our conscious minds. Nietzsche focuses on the subconscious; while Descartes focuses on the conscious mind. "I think, therefore I am."
Nietzsche: You do not "think"!!. You only "believe" that "you think". Your brain is an organ struggling for life, just like your heart, liver, kidneys and everything else!
Descartes: I do not understand what you are saying, Nietzsche!
Nietzsche: You have missed the big picture entirely and focused on the irrelevant, simple matters.
Descartes: I still don't think I hear you!
Nietzsche: Likewise.
Albert Einstein: Doing something over and over again and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.
Friedrich Nietzsche: No it isn't, Einstein! Doing something over and over again is NOT insanity. The very fact that you use the aspect/essence of "insanity" contradicts the whole concept of: A HAPPENING. A happening is just exactly that: A HAPPENING. An indifferent, recurrent happening. And it will always function in our indifferent universe as: a happening. It is only human judgement and interpretation that: a happening; will be thought of as "insanity". Therefore, doing something over and over again and expecting a different result is NOT insanity. Only human minds can determine what doing something over and over again is. Conclusion: IT IS NEITHER "INSANITY" NOR "SANITY"! IT IS A HAPPENING!
Einstein, Descartes and Everbody else: WOW! MIND = BLOWN
Friedrich Nietzsche: No it isn't, Einstein! Doing something over and over again is NOT insanity. The very fact that you use the aspect/essence of "insanity" contradicts the whole concept of: A HAPPENING. A happening is just exactly that: A HAPPENING. An indifferent, recurrent happening. And it will always function in our indifferent universe as: a happening. It is only human judgement and interpretation that: a happening; will be thought of as "insanity". Therefore, doing something over and over again and expecting a different result is NOT insanity. Only human minds can determine what doing something over and over again is. Conclusion: IT IS NEITHER "INSANITY" NOR "SANITY"! IT IS A HAPPENING!
Einstein, Descartes and Everbody else: WOW! MIND = BLOWN
by Abraham's Adversary October 9, 2018
Get the Friedrich Nietzsche mug.