Institutional Gaslighting: When a group of respected people within an institution are posed as investigating on the
victim’s behalf, but in actuality act to belittle or deny the
reality of the harm committed in order to protect the institution’s reputation, the institution can cause the
victim to question their own perceptions of
reality, feelings, instincts, and even sanity. When an authority figure incites self-doubt in the
victim, they are employing a tactic of emotional abuse referred to as “gaslighting, a term coined in reference to domestic abuse.” Perpetrators, whether they are individuals or institutions, use “gaslighting” to
get what they want, typically “without ever taking responsibility for their actions or even their precipitating desires.” When an institution gaslights a victim in order to protect its own reputation, the institutional betrayal silences, invalidates, and harms recent survivors in their most vulnerable states.
LaJuana informs psychiatrist
Dr. Van Schenck, a gangstalker tried to
murder her and she captured the attack on dash-
cam.
Dr. Van Schenck reviews the video and tells patient she is having audio and visual hallucinations. Despite the patients clear and convincing video evidence, the doctor refuses to give patient her regular medication, but says he will write her a perscription to treat
schizophrenia (a medication in-which he recieves financial kick backs) Dr. Van Schenck pretends he's not aware paitent is a Targeted Individual of non-consensual remote Smart
Dust/ Nanotechnology experiments being conducted by Academia and Big Pharma. The doctor documents his false diagnosis into her medical file. LaJuana has just experienced Institutional Gaslighting.