"do you think using the rope is skillfull? oh ok so using the rope is smart??"
Average: "Yes, using them like Wiam did is smart. Light, your a True sander."
Average: "Yes, using them like Wiam did is smart. Light, your a True sander."
by An ut:sander October 8, 2025
Get the True sandermug. by Hot Dog Jim August 1, 2022
Get the Real, true statementmug. True Fan- Not a pretentious. Not often narcissistic fan who believes everyone should think and express the same viewpoints and opinions as themselves. Not a pretentious fan who believes everyone should think and express the same viewpoints and opinions as themselves.
The definition of True Fan on Urban Dictionary by Bettafold_ is not the truth. The definition of True fan on Urban Dictionary on September 23, 2019 is not the truth. /
The definition of True Fan on Urban Dictionary by Bettafold_ is not the truth. The definition of True fan on Urban Dictionary on September 23, 2019 is not the truth. /
If you think our team might lose, then you are no *true fan*
True fans are always positive and have faith in their team, you're no *true fan*
True fans are always positive and have faith in their team, you're no *true fan*
by JordanJohnsonistheone May 25, 2022
Get the True Fanmug. by Fk76375 December 4, 2021
Get the True AEmug. Or Batman.
Charlatan "If I can make up a 'if this then that' statement then what I'm saying is true! It's embedded in the structure of the universe!"
Hym "Yes. Of course. You're clearly not a petty charlatan and a tyrant and you're clearly not using fascist collusion and gaslighting to enrich yourself and subvert the government. And it's NOT opposite world. All of these things are clearly not the case and no one is going to die as a direct result of you doing that."
Hym "Yes. Of course. You're clearly not a petty charlatan and a tyrant and you're clearly not using fascist collusion and gaslighting to enrich yourself and subvert the government. And it's NOT opposite world. All of these things are clearly not the case and no one is going to die as a direct result of you doing that."
by Hym Iam January 21, 2025
Get the If I can make up a 'if this then that' statement then what I'm saying is truemug. True Anal is a genre of porn when a man has anal sex with a woman and then puts his penis inside another woman’s mouth and repeat until climax
Man: Let’s have sex
Woman 1: Let’s do True Anal
Woman 2: It is great
Man: How does it work
Woman 1: Put your penis inside my poop hole
Woman 2: Then in my mouth
Man: Okay
Woman 1: OH YES! HARDER!
Woman 2: Finally, now let me suck your penis
Goes on a porn site
Woman 1: Let’s do True Anal
Woman 2: It is great
Man: How does it work
Woman 1: Put your penis inside my poop hole
Woman 2: Then in my mouth
Man: Okay
Woman 1: OH YES! HARDER!
Woman 2: Finally, now let me suck your penis
Goes on a porn site
by Cultistmania June 10, 2023
Get the True Analmug. The ratio of upvotes awarded to a commenter compared to upvotes awarded to an original poster (OP) weighted for each user's follower count. TAR adjusts for engagement for both parties. True Adjusted Ratio is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ), where a value >1 is considered a "W"
Strengths:
- TAR reflects the true impact of a comment in unbalanced interactions. Comments with fewer followers are augmented, further amplifying OP's humiliation.
- It is possible for a commenter with fewer followers than OP to have fewer upvotes than OP and still obtain a "W".
Limitations:
- True Adjusted Ratio assumes followers of each account are supportive. It does not take into account "hate-followers".
- TAR fails to take virality into account. A comment is more likely to receive engagement during the time when a post is most viral, after which engagement in both original post and comment deteriorate at different geometric rates.
- TAR calculation does not account for downvotes or tertiary responses. While TAR is a more accurate measure in social media spaces with upvote-only rating systems (e.g. Twitter), ratio calculations may be redundant in spaces which use an upvote/downvote system (e.g. Reddit). Tertiary reactions that are ambiguous (e.g. Facebook) are not factored into this calculation.
- "Premium account" algorithms (such as Elon Musk's blue-check model on Twitter) artificially alter views, skewing engagement in favor of paid subscribers.
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ), where a value >1 is considered a "W"
Strengths:
- TAR reflects the true impact of a comment in unbalanced interactions. Comments with fewer followers are augmented, further amplifying OP's humiliation.
- It is possible for a commenter with fewer followers than OP to have fewer upvotes than OP and still obtain a "W".
Limitations:
- True Adjusted Ratio assumes followers of each account are supportive. It does not take into account "hate-followers".
- TAR fails to take virality into account. A comment is more likely to receive engagement during the time when a post is most viral, after which engagement in both original post and comment deteriorate at different geometric rates.
- TAR calculation does not account for downvotes or tertiary responses. While TAR is a more accurate measure in social media spaces with upvote-only rating systems (e.g. Twitter), ratio calculations may be redundant in spaces which use an upvote/downvote system (e.g. Reddit). Tertiary reactions that are ambiguous (e.g. Facebook) are not factored into this calculation.
- "Premium account" algorithms (such as Elon Musk's blue-check model on Twitter) artificially alter views, skewing engagement in favor of paid subscribers.
True Adjusted Ratio: TAR
OP: Original Post
Folₒₚ: Followers of OP
UVₒₚ: Upvotes for OP
Fol꜀: Followers of commenter
UV꜀: Upvotes for commenter
If a user with 100 followers (Folₒₚ = 100) receives 40 upvotes (UVₒₚ = 40) and a comment from a user with 1000 followers (Fol꜀ = 1000) receives 50 upvotes (UV꜀ = 50), traditional calculation would consider OP "ratioed" using traditional calculation:
R = UV꜀/UVₒₚ = 50/40 = 1.25
R > 1, thus OP would be ratioed
However, since OP's follower count is 1/10th that of the commenter's, the True Adjusted Ratio (TAR) is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ) = 100 / 1000 x 50 / 40 = 0.1 x 1.25 = 0.125,
TAR < 1, thus OP would not be ratioed.
OP: Original Post
Folₒₚ: Followers of OP
UVₒₚ: Upvotes for OP
Fol꜀: Followers of commenter
UV꜀: Upvotes for commenter
If a user with 100 followers (Folₒₚ = 100) receives 40 upvotes (UVₒₚ = 40) and a comment from a user with 1000 followers (Fol꜀ = 1000) receives 50 upvotes (UV꜀ = 50), traditional calculation would consider OP "ratioed" using traditional calculation:
R = UV꜀/UVₒₚ = 50/40 = 1.25
R > 1, thus OP would be ratioed
However, since OP's follower count is 1/10th that of the commenter's, the True Adjusted Ratio (TAR) is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ) = 100 / 1000 x 50 / 40 = 0.1 x 1.25 = 0.125,
TAR < 1, thus OP would not be ratioed.
by SlimerAndTheRealGhostbusters June 26, 2023
Get the True Adjusted Ratiomug.