Teacher: Where did you get your information?
Kid1: Wikipedia.
Kid2: The free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit?
Kid1: Yes.
Teacher: Don't use Wikipedia because it is wrong.
*Kid1 and 2 stare at Teacher*
Kid1: Wikipedia.
Kid2: The free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit?
Kid1: Yes.
Teacher: Don't use Wikipedia because it is wrong.
*Kid1 and 2 stare at Teacher*
by xX420MCplayerXx January 10, 2021
by random guy online69420 January 14, 2022
By the people, but not necessarily for the people. Attempts to define and explain everything, ideally without writing a book on every topic.
Has the same issues as any other democracy or a place, with group majorities - tribalism and its cultural influence: A place were simps, feminists, bitches, are making their tribal biases/opinions 'scientific', while linking what is pretty much their own blog's shitposts for sources; and nerds are trying to make their hobby/area of expertise articles as unreadable as possible for a commoner.
Has a tendency of throwing you into a rabbit whole of information, when you've already forgotten your initial question and have ended up reading articles on ancient Chinese schools of thought for no reason.
Has the same issues as any other democracy or a place, with group majorities - tribalism and its cultural influence: A place were simps, feminists, bitches, are making their tribal biases/opinions 'scientific', while linking what is pretty much their own blog's shitposts for sources; and nerds are trying to make their hobby/area of expertise articles as unreadable as possible for a commoner.
Has a tendency of throwing you into a rabbit whole of information, when you've already forgotten your initial question and have ended up reading articles on ancient Chinese schools of thought for no reason.
I disagree with that wikipedia article, so I've edited the definition to be a more 'objective representation of reality'. Also I'm undoing all the edits that disagree with me, my majority will prevail!
I'm wikipedia-eductated.
I'm wikipedia-eductated.
by veinsofgold June 01, 2022
An extremely biased and informational source where everyone is the author. People get loads of information from outside sources and cite them. Are those outside sources reliable? Some are, some are not. They do not have to be
I just read an article about Pearl Harbor on Wikipedia! It was packed with so much information??? HOW DO THEY GET THIS???
by r59b1 June 07, 2023
Teacher: Now class I want you to research The 1663 war. This is due on Monday submit by 12 am. Please don't do this last minute and use Wikipedia.
Me on Sunday 11:55 pm: Right so the 1663 war happened in 2015 I Antarctica. Makes sense thanks Wikipedia.
Me on Sunday 11:55 pm: Right so the 1663 war happened in 2015 I Antarctica. Makes sense thanks Wikipedia.
by AreYouReadingMyName March 01, 2021
A source teachers will normally call unreliable cause it can be “changed” even though it is normally monitored 24/7
Teacher: Look for a source online I will not credit you for Wikipedia. Kid: Wikipedia is a reliable source it’s monitored on a daily basis.
by 20mm Hispano Mkll Cannon September 06, 2020
A source teachers will normally call unreliable cause it can be “changed” even though it is normally monitored 24/7
Teacher: Look for a source online I will not credit you for Wikipedia. Kid: Wikipedia is a reliable source it’s monitored on a daily basis.
by 20mm Hispano Mkll Cannon September 06, 2020