You mean... The incels? Is that👈 THAT ☝️? The weak men? The cause of all the worlds problems? If only they were listening to you better everything would be fine? Is that what you mean?
Hym "Here we have it kiddos! This is 'How we solve the Single Men Crisis (according to the public discourse around the matter)' in several points. You ready? Ok. Here we go.
Step 1: NEVER engage with the 'Single men' publicly or directly. They are to be postured about from afar by people who are disproportionately successful in the dating market and/or women.
Step 2: The discourse should be hyper-fixated on getting men into long-term committed relationships while ignoring the fact (entirely) that the DEFAULT social interaction between women and the dating market is hook-up culture. That's the DEFAULT.(God I wish I had a way to make a diagram here.... Shit.) So, the goal is to find a way to get men to bypass (entirely) the 1st order dating pool and enter the smaller, ancillary dating pool of people seeking long-term committed relationships. Which women are not currently doing. They're not entering the ancillary dating pool until they are in their 30's and satisfied with their career. So we have to pretend this dichotomy between the 1st and 2nd order dating pools does not exist at all costs.
Hym "Here we have it kiddos! This is 'How we solve the Single Men Crisis (according to the public discourse around the matter)' in several points. You ready? Ok. Here we go.
Step 1: NEVER engage with the 'Single men' publicly or directly. They are to be postured about from afar by people who are disproportionately successful in the dating market and/or women.
Step 2: The discourse should be hyper-fixated on getting men into long-term committed relationships while ignoring the fact (entirely) that the DEFAULT social interaction between women and the dating market is hook-up culture. That's the DEFAULT.(God I wish I had a way to make a diagram here.... Shit.) So, the goal is to find a way to get men to bypass (entirely) the 1st order dating pool and enter the smaller, ancillary dating pool of people seeking long-term committed relationships. Which women are not currently doing. They're not entering the ancillary dating pool until they are in their 30's and satisfied with their career. So we have to pretend this dichotomy between the 1st and 2nd order dating pools does not exist at all costs.
Step 3: We need to obfuscate the causes of disparate outcomes with abstract and sophistical vaguery. It's not 'disparities in general attractiveness, transactional interactions, and fat cocks = outcome' it's ' "The Work" = Outcome.' And if you do 'The work' you will get NOT the outcome of moving into the 1st order dating pool. You'll get a DIFFERENT outcome. You'll get into the ancillary dating pool and that will go however it happens to go.
Step 4: We really have to drive home the fact that this HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WOMEN. Women are not complicit, culpable, or even a variable in the disparities in success. If more men were like the men who are CURRENTLY disproportionately successful... Then those NEW and IMPROVED men... Would do THE OPPOSITE of what the CURRENTLY SUCCESSFUL men are doing... And have long-term relationships with the women... Because... Reasons... Pft! That's the solution to these fucking idiots! Make the bad men like the good men... And then expect the NEW good men... To do, NOT what the current good men are doing, but rather, something else entirely. That's the fucking solution to the single men crisis. There you go guys. Problem solved!"
Step 4: We really have to drive home the fact that this HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WOMEN. Women are not complicit, culpable, or even a variable in the disparities in success. If more men were like the men who are CURRENTLY disproportionately successful... Then those NEW and IMPROVED men... Would do THE OPPOSITE of what the CURRENTLY SUCCESSFUL men are doing... And have long-term relationships with the women... Because... Reasons... Pft! That's the solution to these fucking idiots! Make the bad men like the good men... And then expect the NEW good men... To do, NOT what the current good men are doing, but rather, something else entirely. That's the fucking solution to the single men crisis. There you go guys. Problem solved!"
by Hym Iam October 02, 2023
The holy water to petrify the devil; aka the single combination of identities that SJWs and the current state lefties are at (radical liberalism) and are losing their shit over. It came with the rise of "wokeness" in the 2010s, particularly.
*Usually a way to refer to those modern feminists and LGBTQ+ advocates and allies despise. Often said, when serious/unironic, without care or awareness of how sexist, racist, and overall discriminatory it is, or as a propagating phrase to indoctrinate and mislead. Rose to popularity through TikTok, Twitter, and Tumblr; the smelly depths of the Internet, really.
Sometimes accompanied with "old," like when referring to those who made the Roe v. Wade decision.
Simply put, the final boss modern day liberals claim are perpetually feeding into their suffering.
*Usually a way to refer to those modern feminists and LGBTQ+ advocates and allies despise. Often said, when serious/unironic, without care or awareness of how sexist, racist, and overall discriminatory it is, or as a propagating phrase to indoctrinate and mislead. Rose to popularity through TikTok, Twitter, and Tumblr; the smelly depths of the Internet, really.
Sometimes accompanied with "old," like when referring to those who made the Roe v. Wade decision.
Simply put, the final boss modern day liberals claim are perpetually feeding into their suffering.
Blue-haired they/them: Leave it to you straight, cis, white men to take away my rights as a non-binary, pansexual girlboss.
Their estranged father: You were exactly who you hated before 2018.
Their estranged father: You were exactly who you hated before 2018.
by thoughtscanberead December 05, 2023
by SLAYYMAMAS May 20, 2022
A sissy liberal who likes jazz.
Possibly a classy guy but also likes honey on the side.
One who fits the females gaze.
Possibly a classy guy but also likes honey on the side.
One who fits the females gaze.
by Michael Pichael November 30, 2023
by Hercolena Oliver May 04, 2008
Dauwoud
by Thetruthgiver3000 July 02, 2019
The expanded version of “it’s not gay if it’s a three-way.” It’s not gay if the two girls are doing lesbian stuff and their men are watching them do it.
Her: Idk if I can lick her pussy? Won’t that kinda be gay?
The boyfriends of the two girls: Nahhh you know what they say—it’s not gay if their men are watching.
The boyfriends of the two girls: Nahhh you know what they say—it’s not gay if their men are watching.
by BillBrasky913 March 01, 2024