by Lenny Face - ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) February 25, 2017
by Wall Street Journal March 8, 2017
A fucking horseshit news source that should do suicide. It takes everything out of context and calls people anti-semitic even though no body actually cares so they're just trying to get more $ because they know nobody actually reads their shit newspaper. Only dumbass hypofritz work there because no one else is dumb enough to stoop to their level.
"I work at wall street journal," said Alfred Chokesondick, a very retarded an unreliable journalist.
"Fuck you. Tell satan I said hi when you go back from where you came from," responded smart person that knows Wall Street Journal sucks donkey balls.
"Fuck you. Tell satan I said hi when you go back from where you came from," responded smart person that knows Wall Street Journal sucks donkey balls.
by Where the frogs February 25, 2017
he act of using Urban Dictionary for fact checking the definition of words that were used before the existence of Urban Dictionary.
According to Urban Dictionary journalism, Kavanaugh is obviously lying about the definition of boof, which he and his friends used in the early 1980s, because I read the definition on a website that was created in 1999.
by The Tastiest July 25, 2019
A subset of the more general human interest story, frowny-face journalism takes some boring, abstract, impersonal policy change or social problem, takes a big photo of some sad children whose playcentre is closing, an old couple who are being forced out of their subsidised housing or, in this case, a recently unemployed man losing his home(s). This way, readers automatically know what to think about the story - generally 'awwwww'.
"Did you read that article about the sad children whose playcentre was bulldozed down and replaced with a right-wing lobby group headquarters?"
"Was it Frowny-face journalism"
"it made me go awwww"
"Was it Frowny-face journalism"
"it made me go awwww"
by NZ Nanny July 24, 2009
Frowny-face journalism is a subset of the more general human interest story, which takes some boring, abstract, impersonal policy change or social problem, uses a large photo to illustrate the sadness of the story (e.g.crying children whose playcentre is closing or an old couple who are being forced out of their subsidised housing). As a consequence, readers automatically know what to think about the story - generally 'awwwww'. This is bad enough in itself, but there is an added danger: that of taking the analogy between the sad individual and the social issue too far.
Reading such stories is a common cause of news-rage
Reading such stories is a common cause of news-rage
Example of a frowny-face journalism piece from the New Zealand Herald "Bruce Burgess, 60 years old and a qualified engineer, has been busy his entire adult life. Aside from a couple of years overseas in the early 1970s, he has worked, paid his taxes and saved his money.
His wife Jo has held down regular work as an office administrator and accounts person. Neither of them smoke, they don't take extravagant holidays, and drink only occasionally."
It makes you go "awwww"
His wife Jo has held down regular work as an office administrator and accounts person. Neither of them smoke, they don't take extravagant holidays, and drink only occasionally."
It makes you go "awwww"
by Springbok28 July 24, 2009
High class shitrag newspaper catering to a bunch of little office-dwelling fucks who light their cigars with hundred dollar biils.
Sloan scanned the Wall Street Journal looking for the company she ass-rammed on the stock exchange yesterday.
by Ebeling June 24, 2003