A proposition of ontologistics (historical aestheticism) that scapegoating never disappears it merely switches references (contra-referentializes).
A postulation of historical aestheticism that argues that the West escaped institutional religious superstition ie. scapegoating by the employment of racial scapegoating eg. colonialism.
Implies that rationalism can never fully escape religion.
A postulation of historical aestheticism that argues that the West escaped institutional religious superstition ie. scapegoating by the employment of racial scapegoating eg. colonialism.
Implies that rationalism can never fully escape religion.
Collusion is an instance of contra-referentialization.
by sandraxine September 02, 2018
A specification of the mind-body problem in which the "body" or more specifically object external to the human body represents the physically far emerging from the past and "space" represents the physically near emerging from the future.
The divergent contiguity of an object external to the human body.
The divergence of an object no matter how close to the whole of a human body being "far" or in the past if there is space or "future" separating the object and the human body ("now"). Inversely, any constituent part of the human body is "now" or in the present because it is contiguous with the "whole" of the body even if a constituent part of the body is farther away from the center of the body than the separated object.
Implies that the farther external contiguity is away from internal contiguity (the human body) the more likely it is to be a holograph or expression (holomorph) in contrast to an isograph or appearance (isomorph).
"Touch" establishes contiguity between the object and the body and unites the two objects in the illusion of now.
Space-body divergence resolves mind-body duality with mind-body contiguity in contrast to mind-body congruity.
The divergent contiguity of an object external to the human body.
The divergence of an object no matter how close to the whole of a human body being "far" or in the past if there is space or "future" separating the object and the human body ("now"). Inversely, any constituent part of the human body is "now" or in the present because it is contiguous with the "whole" of the body even if a constituent part of the body is farther away from the center of the body than the separated object.
Implies that the farther external contiguity is away from internal contiguity (the human body) the more likely it is to be a holograph or expression (holomorph) in contrast to an isograph or appearance (isomorph).
"Touch" establishes contiguity between the object and the body and unites the two objects in the illusion of now.
Space-body divergence resolves mind-body duality with mind-body contiguity in contrast to mind-body congruity.
The space-body problem says that the human body is "now," the space separating the object and the body is "future," and the separated object is "past." This implies that the mind and body are isomorphic (have the same source point).
More meta-specifically space-body contiguity implies that consciousness or the "mind" emerges from space metamorphically to gravity's colinearity to time.
Thus space-body contiguity is actually mind-space colinearity or mind-space metamorphicity.
More meta-specifically space-body contiguity implies that consciousness or the "mind" emerges from space metamorphically to gravity's colinearity to time.
Thus space-body contiguity is actually mind-space colinearity or mind-space metamorphicity.
by sandraxine October 13, 2018
The structure-of-reality is made up of three components: a circle with infinite^infinite area which itself contains an uncountable line-set of discrete radial-area; and a countably infinite number of points - - transfinities--which comprise a Vikaasian superset.
Keep in mind that transfinity is the intersection of infinity and infinity-to-infinity.
Keep in mind that transfinity is the intersection of infinity and infinity-to-infinity.
The structure-of-reality can be divided into three sets:
The representative schemata, which is made up of lines between the discrete area and the countable number of transinfinite points; the referential set which is made up of lines between the discrete area and the circle's uncountable area; and the experiential (sensual) set which is made up of liminal layers connecting the uncountable lines' discrete area and the uncountable area of the internal-contiguous circle.
The texture of reality is the sensual set: made of layers between the discrete area of the internal radial lines and the uncountable area of the circle.
The representative schemata, which is made up of lines between the discrete area and the countable number of transinfinite points; the referential set which is made up of lines between the discrete area and the circle's uncountable area; and the experiential (sensual) set which is made up of liminal layers connecting the uncountable lines' discrete area and the uncountable area of the internal-contiguous circle.
The texture of reality is the sensual set: made of layers between the discrete area of the internal radial lines and the uncountable area of the circle.
by sandraxine November 18, 2019
by sandraxine August 02, 2018
A relationship of function which deconstructs into a duality of momentum.
An instance of the Vikaas Paradox.
An instance of the Vikaas Paradox.
Duocracy implies that a singularity of a function is in actuality a duality of two contrapositional momentums.
by sandraxine July 19, 2018
The concept that physical space (3 dimensions) and all extant physical and metaphysical dimensions are manifestations of an infinitely recursive duality of linear and cyclical time in which cyclical time is itself understood to be a duality of linear and cyclical time. Implies that the maximum number of dimensions (physical and metaphysical) is infinity^2. Implies that all information in the physical and metaphysical realm can be expressed (united) as an expression of time and that linear time (acting within three physical dimensions) is an illusion created by cyclical time. Implies that all design is an illusion, except for an infinitely recursive duality. Implication of the Vikaasian paradox.
Vikaasian space unites all physical and metaphysical dimensions, indicates that the metaphysical is just as "real" as the physical, and posits design as an illusion.
by sandraxine June 17, 2017
An intersubjective form of identitarianism asserting that the materialistic contrasts between cultures are not biological but rather are linguistic.
Interracism divides cultures into a linguistic duality of high-context (dramatic) and low-context (stoic) attributes pursuant to the metas delineated by anthropologist Edward H. Hall.
Also called "metaracism" in conflationary terms.
Interracism divides cultures into a linguistic duality of high-context (dramatic) and low-context (stoic) attributes pursuant to the metas delineated by anthropologist Edward H. Hall.
Also called "metaracism" in conflationary terms.
Interracism argues that tangibly distinct cultures are separated by linguistic interpretation in contrast to IQ scores.
by sandraxine June 18, 2018