Hym Iam's definitions

Kill the retard, fuck the whore

I think... Uh... I think I got some Oedipus complex stuff going on. I don't know... I'm not a doctor.

Hym "So... I've been getting a lot of questions about the 'Kill the retard, fuck the whore' thing so here's my response: You idiots are referencing the thing that you're doing to me but you really don't seem to understand how it works. So, I'll explain to you it in a way that your malformed and unsophisticated shit-brains can understand. Everyone who sees me does the thing that you are doing. Every time they see me. You follow? You keeping up with this? Ok. So, for a time, everything out of everyone's mouths was some kind of defense or justification for the existence of a mentality disabled retard molestation cult. As you all probably know, that's a total non-starter for me. So I wanted to reaffirm that my stance on the topic has not changed. Kill the retard. Fuck the whore. That shit was annoying and if I ever start a business I will make they days that any one of those people die a holiday and will give my employees the day off. Additionally, some guy told me 'I was right' the other day. I know I'm right! I appreciate the sentiment though. And some people referenced the brothel madam today. Very friendly. But that's neither here nor there. I've already blown past my point. I've already done what I've set out to do I guess so... Yeah... Give me my free money now please. 😐"

by Hym Iam May 4, 2022

Trump Libel Lawsuit

If Fox News still has money after he sues them and the news network continues operating... Does he even actually DO anything other than waste everybody's time?

Hym "If the Trump Libel Lawsuit is just 2 billionaires transferring a fraction of their money to one another... How are they not just paying the lawyers to argue a case that doesn't matter because the outcome won't improve or diminish the quality and content of either of their lives to eat up court time and pay their lawyers to do nothing for a couple of weeks? The lawyers don't care. They make money. The judge is on salary he doesn't give a shit. He or SHE has nothing better to do. The media is getting paid to talk about something that literally has no effect on anything or anyone so they don't care. That IS the entire political apparatus. Assholes. Phoning it in so THEY can keep THEIR LIVES... THE SAME. Because they don't have to do shit. Those fucking Trump layers aren't stressed out about that. Because win or lose it doesn't affect anything or anyone it's happening to. But me not getting paid for AI is going to be world changing. I don't want to work. I don't care if you don't want to work either you are not me. I created AI. That is worth money. You give me that money or I will stab a child. You WILL BE directly responsible for me doing that. It doesn't matter what you tell yourself. It doesn't matter what you tell other people. And hurry it up."

by Hym Iam July 19, 2025

Good

Well...

Hym "Good thing I DON'T HAVE TO TAKE IT BACK. I wouldn't if I could. And the time will be accounted for when you give me my money for my contributions to AI and I come for your livelyhoods."

by Hym Iam January 11, 2025

Ethical Emotivism

Your faux ethical dilemma regarding the organ transplant can only exist in a vaccum (Though you may be right that people do ENGAGE IN ethical emotivism). As I see it, your proposition isn't a singular linear line of reasoning. How you're thinking about it seems to be this: If you can -1 to +5 should you do that. But really your proposition is the intersection of several constituent elements regarding personal property rights (Does the person own their organs), consent (Is it ethical to take something from someone else without consent), authority (Is it ethical for a "We" to have authority over an individual). So, if yes (you ought to take the organs) do you have to reconcile with the constituent elements of the proposition? If it's ethical for "a group to take the organs from 1 to save 5 people" is it, then, also ethical for "a group to take the property of an individual without their consent" (in a broader sense)? Or are you just making a 1 time exception for this guy? Or is whether or not it's ethical contingent on what you're taking and whether or not you're saving lives? You see the distinction I'm trying to make, right? Maybe I'm not understanding it properly.

Hym "To me it just sounds like a repackaging of the trolley problem. And I don't see how it's incompatible with utilitarianism because if you aim to maximize pleasure then it's either a total of 1 unit of pleasure (1 person who continues to live so they can experience pleasure) or 5 units... Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying... I guess the distinction between the trolly problem and your thing IS the intersection of constituent elements. Rather than just deciding whether or not to switch the tracks you're deliberately putting a guy ON THE TRACK. So it's a little more direct I guess... You're slightly more culpable in the outcome... That's a good one though. That aside, I think ethical emotivism is something people engage in rather than the default. I do still think you can create a mathematical ethical scale. Like my thing! I kill a kid (-2), you kill me (-1), I get my stuff back (+1). That's all I got for now. Bring it back up later maybe I'll come up with something else. Hopefully that isn't too incoherent to understand."

by Hym Iam March 14, 2024

You can't imagine

Why Israel would block aid? TO STARVE THEM. Because they're psychopath worshipping schizos "Where not killing them! God is! See? I did it indirectly so it's God!"

Hym "You can't imagine why they would do it? Because they want to make an example out of them to deter future attacks. How abouts, start raping Jewish women around the world and don't stop until they start letting food in. Start with Ben's wife's."

by Hym Iam March 27, 2024

God

And God is a guy taking credit for something he didn't do...

Some guy "Hey man, you ever wonder who made everything?"

Some other guy "Uuuum-I did that... Yep... I did that waaaaaaaay back in the day. Before you were even a guy."

The first guy "Awshitnoway for real!?"

God "Yeah dawg... Yup... It was me."

Dawg "No fuckin way bro that is sick! That must have taken a long time."

God "Nah Dawg, that shit only took 7 days. Nah, 6 days. I took a nap the 7th day."

Dawg "Damn bro... That's nuts."

God "Right? Yeah, so I'm going to need you to burn down Sodom and Gomorrah."

Dawg "What?"

God "Yeah, I'm not about any of that shit. Go. Grab another guy. Go get Abraham and tell him we're going to burn down the city."

Dawg "Aw well shit man... I guess I'd better do that then..."

God "Yeah I will burn your soul forever if you don't!"

Dawg "Oho! Man, ouch! Doesn't sound fun. Alright... I'll tell Michael about the you making everything in 7 days shit though. You're a dope guy man. Thanks for all the stuff."

God "Yeah, we'll kill the canaanites next. Oh, and this is my son Jesus and he's better than everyone forever."

Dawg "Aw cool, bye Jesus!" *Walks away*

by Hym Iam June 19, 2023

That's why it's wrong

What I did was harmless explicitly because there is nothing I could do for those women. You don't actually intend to teach me anything. If that's the case you're just as bad as I am. But that isn't why you are doing this.

A retard "That's why it's wrong."

Hym "You don't care. Every time I masterbate I'm fantasizing about raping one of you. How's that? Do that make you feel better? You fuck."

by Hym Iam November 9, 2024