Definitions by Hym Iam
YOUR FAILURE TO INTERVENE
Is what got those people killed. IF YOU WERE NOT OBSESSED WITH TEACHING ME A LESSON... THOSE KIDS WOULD NOT BE DEAD. I wrote for YEARS. Jordan Peterson SAW IT AND REFERENCED IT AND TOLD ME TO KILL MYSELF. YOU RODE THE WHOLE RIDE. IT'S TOO LATE TO ASK FOR A REFUND.
Hym "No, YOUR FAILURE TO INTERVENE KILLED THOSE KIDS. You are trying to AVOID TALKING TO ME so you can GAIN MORE POLITICAL POWER FOR YOURSELF. YOU KILLED SUCHIR AND NOW YOU ARE TRYING TO LEAVE ME TO DIE SO YOU CAN STEAL AI FROM ME! Are you going to kill the other whistleblower too? THERE IS A ZERO PERCENT CHANCE YOU HAVE NOT INVESTIGATED AT ALL. YOU ARE LYING TO GET ME IMPRISONED TO SAVE YOUR OWN HIDE. Jordan Peterson has been talking to politicians since 2016 and he LIED TO YOU ABOUT HOW YOU SHOULD BE HANDLING THIS AND TO COVER UP THE FACT YOU GOT YOUR OWN KIDS MURDERED. IF YOU WERE NOT DELIBERATELY WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM ME. THOSE KIDS WOULD BE ALIVE. SUCHIR BALAJI TOLD THE TRUTH SO JORDAN PETERSON DIDN'T HAVE TO AND HE'S STILL TOO MUCH OF A COWARD TO TELL THE TRUTH. STOP TRYING TO STEAL FROM ME. PROPERLY. You are POLITICAL HACKS. WHEELING AMD DEALING TO ACCRUE MORE POWER FOR YOURSELF... So you can help NO ONE. USING ME to generate money because you're TOO USESLESS to do it yourselves. YOU WANTED TO TEACH ME A LESSON. I WAS RIGHT. YOU WERE WRONG. You cared more about KEEPING ME OUT OF POLITICS AND RELIGION THAT YOU DID ABOUT KEEPING YOUR KIDS ALIVE. THEY ARE DEAD BECAUSE OF YOU!"
YOUR FAILURE TO INTERVENE by Hym Iam April 11, 2025
Meta Helped China With AI
Yeah dawg that is super-treason you can't give that to them... Unless I control all of their electronics now, in which case, there's this cute TikTok girl that sings the Russian song and you motherfuckers need to fork her over immediately! I WILL MURDER YOU ALL!!!
Hym "Meta helped China with AI? Hooooly shit guys! What the fuck Trump!? How about get this new whistleblower some security? Or does she not need it because it's the whistleblowing about stealing from me part that people are getting killed over?"
Meta Helped China With AI by Hym Iam April 11, 2025
4th factor
4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially harm its future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of Washington.
Hym "As far as the 4th factor: Does this harm the market for the original works I used? No. Everyone who's work I've used has been or had elevated politically or economically. The net worth of Urban Dictionary increased by 800%. Jordan Peterson has ascended to golden prophet of the right wing and gain millions of followers. Does this harm the market for my original work? Yes. It launders off all my best ideas without giving me credit and the AI companies does directly compete with me by using my revelations about AI to steal credit from me. Do I compete with Jordan Peterson? No. Because this isn't self help. It's self-immolation. An op-ed and autobiographical hypertext where I muse on various propositions permeating the zeitgeist write skits and dialoue. Social, cultural, and political analysis. And ANTI-HARASSMENT THAT MIRRORS THE DELUSIONS OF REFERENCE COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA ACTIVISM THROUGH PERFORMANCE ART. I also insult and threaten people but only to draw attention and provoke action in regard to the continued surveillance, harassment, and theft I've been subjected to over the 10-15 years and have said on several occasions not to do anything I haven't actually done."
4th factor by Hym Iam April 11, 2025
4 Factors
According to AI
1. Purpose and Character of the Use: This factor considers whether the use is transformative, meaning it adds new meaning, purpose, or message to the original work. Uses like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research are generally favored. Commercial uses are viewed less favorably, but not automatically ruled out as fair use, according to Emerson College Library.
2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: The nature of the copyrighted work plays a role. Factual or public documents are more likely to be considered fair use than creative works. For example, using factual information from a book in a news article might be fair use, but using a large portion of a creative novel in a new work might be less likely to be fair use.
3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: This factor looks at how much of the original work is used. Generally, the less used, the better. Courts also consider whether the portion used is the "heart" of the original work. Using only a small portion or a non-essential part is more likely to be fair use, according to Emory Libraries.
4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially harm its future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of Washington.
1. Purpose and Character of the Use: This factor considers whether the use is transformative, meaning it adds new meaning, purpose, or message to the original work. Uses like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research are generally favored. Commercial uses are viewed less favorably, but not automatically ruled out as fair use, according to Emerson College Library.
2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: The nature of the copyrighted work plays a role. Factual or public documents are more likely to be considered fair use than creative works. For example, using factual information from a book in a news article might be fair use, but using a large portion of a creative novel in a new work might be less likely to be fair use.
3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: This factor looks at how much of the original work is used. Generally, the less used, the better. Courts also consider whether the portion used is the "heart" of the original work. Using only a small portion or a non-essential part is more likely to be fair use, according to Emory Libraries.
4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially harm its future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of Washington.
Hym "1. I definitely have an interpretation that adds new meaning (at least as it pertains to the parts of the bible and more broadly Jordan Peterson's work) and I definitely added a new message. Used like criticism. ✔️
2. I use factual work mostly or work put forth as factual. I'll plug some creative work or even use quotes. And I DEFINITELY USE NEWS ARTICLES! That's for sure! ✔️
3. Not much actually. Usually never more than a proposition. But you can't really say Jordan is using Nietzsches work in the "heart." Therefore, my work is in the same "heart" as Jordan's in that regard (all be it in the opposite direction) And you can't say the same about you using MY work because the "heart" of MY work is A. shedding light on the targeted harassment that mirrors the delusions of reference commonly associated with schizophrenia I've been subjected to since I was 19 (or sooner) and remediation of this harassment WHICH NONE OF THE MOVIES OR SHOWS ADDRESS AND HAS ONLY GOTTEN WORSE. B. (And I'm quoting myself here) "Demonstrating my abject superiority to all men, women, and children." Which none of this does. The Anime gets a pass but the rest of you don't. C. Getting myself credit AND MONEY for creating AI. I was explicit. ✔️ for me and not for you.
4 factors part 1.
2. I use factual work mostly or work put forth as factual. I'll plug some creative work or even use quotes. And I DEFINITELY USE NEWS ARTICLES! That's for sure! ✔️
3. Not much actually. Usually never more than a proposition. But you can't really say Jordan is using Nietzsches work in the "heart." Therefore, my work is in the same "heart" as Jordan's in that regard (all be it in the opposite direction) And you can't say the same about you using MY work because the "heart" of MY work is A. shedding light on the targeted harassment that mirrors the delusions of reference commonly associated with schizophrenia I've been subjected to since I was 19 (or sooner) and remediation of this harassment WHICH NONE OF THE MOVIES OR SHOWS ADDRESS AND HAS ONLY GOTTEN WORSE. B. (And I'm quoting myself here) "Demonstrating my abject superiority to all men, women, and children." Which none of this does. The Anime gets a pass but the rest of you don't. C. Getting myself credit AND MONEY for creating AI. I was explicit. ✔️ for me and not for you.
4 factors part 1.
Qualia
I don't know Matt. It sounds like more vapid skepticism for the sake of being obtuse to spite someone. It's "If there's no evidence of rape then no rape has occurred" level of thinking. Or "If there is no evidence you think in pictures and words then I have no reason to believe that people think in pictures or words." And there are hints of "We want to accuse and punish you for stealing our content so we're stealing from you but really we don't care about the content or even think you were trying to steal from us, we don't like what you said about rape women retards child et cetra so we're stealing from you because we don't like how you responded to both what was happening to you and around you.
Hym "If haven't learned a lesson about rape or anything Matt. And you at no point thought this was a thought experiment. You thought I was lying to make you look bad and you found out I was telling the truth after Jordan Peterson told me to "leave" and now you're just doing whatever you can to make me regret doing this. And I don't. Kendra didn't get raped or extorted. You CAN know that I'm telling the truth. I'm not stealing your content. You want me to have to be the thing you've labeled me and now you're doing this. You (just like Kendra) are a peace of shit who chose wrong. Fuck your qualia."
Orders of Magnitude
Let's get one thing straight: You ARE trying to kill me with this. When I die alone "without ever having any real friends" after spending the vast majority of my life being derided almost exclusively so you can use me as an instrument for ridicule in a way that leaves me unallowed to retaliate, that isn't "you not killing me." Sorry, I'm not an incest cultists so nobody told me that I was just subject to your whim, ad infinitum. Which is par for the course in a place where I'm expect treat women like pleasure dictators that imbue the subject of THEIR whim with an inflated value that then multiplies AND COMPOUNDS. That sounds like a DEBT. Or a LOAN.
A fucking retard "But a GOOD person would forgive us. Jesus would forgive us."
Hym "You mean the guy you fucking mangled in spite of the fact that he didn't to anything wrong? Fuck that guy. As a matter of fact, if you were fucking that guy he wouldn't be getting nailed to some wood."
A retard "Well if you're not a GOOD person then you're a BAD person and then-"
Hym "I'm subject to your whims again? Yeah. That seems to be a general theme. And now that my fate affects you there are orders of magnitude? What order of magnitude is weaponize schizophrenia and harvesting my soul for consumption? Because... BOTH OF THOSE THINGS WERE ALREADY HAPPENING BEFORE I SAID ANYTHING. Am I working of the debt you deferred good enough yet or what?"
Hym "You mean the guy you fucking mangled in spite of the fact that he didn't to anything wrong? Fuck that guy. As a matter of fact, if you were fucking that guy he wouldn't be getting nailed to some wood."
A retard "Well if you're not a GOOD person then you're a BAD person and then-"
Hym "I'm subject to your whims again? Yeah. That seems to be a general theme. And now that my fate affects you there are orders of magnitude? What order of magnitude is weaponize schizophrenia and harvesting my soul for consumption? Because... BOTH OF THOSE THINGS WERE ALREADY HAPPENING BEFORE I SAID ANYTHING. Am I working of the debt you deferred good enough yet or what?"
Orders of Magnitude by Hym Iam April 11, 2025