Is what you say when someone is leading someone else to a conclusion that they wouldn’t have otherwise drawn without your input. They
use this all the time in courtroom dramas and I’ve seen some of those which means I’m
technically a layer. No big
deal or anything...
Hym “He was clearly NOT going to say ‘wisdom.’ He
said ‘FREEDOM’ and was not going to say wisdom until YOU
said wisdom. So... Um, leading the witness your
honor! That’s the second time in those clips that you did it too! You did it to the other guy too!”
Dr. Moses Aaronson “Wouldn’t you say that the conclusion you’re trying to draw is the conclusion I want you draw and that I already have drawn in the past?”
Professor Junior
Senior-Esquire the 3rd “Why YES! I was! I was going to say that! And I was in no
way lead to that conclusion by you leading me there! I’m not here to be a sycophantic yes
man whose sole purpose is to affirm your subjective interpretation of the Bible!”
Hym “Ha! Ridiculous! I just saved everyone reading this the
trouble of watching your Exodus lecture. That’s all it is. You aggregating your cronies to affirm your propositional ethic. ‘God is too perfect for anyone to be around so I, Dr. Jeeple Jorpson, need to act as an intermediary for it’s will! You need the structure I provide because you can’t be trusted to make decisions because you are basically an
animal to me! Or worse if you’re Hym!”