The comprehensive framework proposing that all fields of inquiry exist on a multidimensional spectrum defined by axes including: mathematical rigor, experimental control, predictive
power, reproducibility, and objectivity. This theory explains why mathematics is at one
end (maximal rigor, minimal empirical content) and literary criticism at the other (minimal rigor, maximal interpretation), with everything else distributed in between. The theory of the spectrum of sciences acknowledges that "science" isn't a
binary category but a region of spectral space, with
fuzzy boundaries, contested territories, and ongoing border disputes. It's the theory that makes
peace between warring departments by saying, "You'
re all on the spectrum—just different parts of it."
Example: "She used the theory of the spectrum of sciences to calm a faculty meeting where
physics and sociology were fighting over funding. 'You're both on the spectrum,' she said. '
Physics is high on the mathematical-rigor axis; sociology is high on the real-
world-relevance axis. Different coordinates, same spectral space. Can we share?' They couldn't, but at least they understood why they were fighting."