imperially pissed 

When your so pissed off, it surpasses, beyond belief to the point where others cannot believe how pissed off you are. If Royally pissed means your pissed off beyond what you can believe. Then Imperially Pissed, means, your so pissed off others cannot believe it.

His Imperial Highness, Aerick Lux, is so pissed off others cannot believe, such hatred can be achieved, He is Royal, but his anger, brings to a level of Imperialness that simply cannot be beleived even when witnessed. He is Imperially Pissed off.

imperially pissed by Aerick Lux Star Emperor December 8, 2013

impartial 

not partial or biased; fair; just

Finally, a fair impartial judge.

impartial by jman3564 December 8, 2014

Impartial 

Neither good nor evil, a little a both but mostly neutral.

I am very impartial

Impartial by Qwert2o1 January 24, 2017

impartial 

A constant state of being; a means of existing during any kind of nomination, campaigning, or voting period. For clarity, people must be constantly reminded that you do not have an opinion, while simultaneously giving your opinion on the topic.

During the election for the engineering society Stephen yelled I'm impartial through the corridor when he was asked to vote.

impartial by Firehose2.0 November 22, 2016

Impartialising 

The act of splitting something that is whole into many different whole subparts.

I am impartialising my music releases into singles, EPs and albums.

Impartialising by KEkdisone September 16, 2023

Impartiality 

When apparently just doesn’t cut it

‘ Impartiality I can’t spell’

Impartiality by Unkown9293939 June 18, 2025

Impartial Capturing 

Impartial Capturing refers to a political condition in which the ostensible lines of ideological division are not merely blurred or skewed, but disregarded altogether. Most pronounced in the United States, where lobbying groups and political action committees finance candidates and policymakers across the full spectrum, it ensures bipartisan capture and near-total domination of policy. The arbitrary distinctions so often drawn between Republicans and Democrats become little more than stagecraft, designed to perpetuate the illusion of democratic choice while masking the deeper reality of systemic subservience to well-funded interests. Organisations such as AIPAC exemplify this mechanism, distributing influence across both parties to guarantee that their priorities remain unchallenged, irrespective of electoral outcomes. Though its clearest expression is found in America, variants of this phenomenon exist in other nations, where capital similarly transcends ideology to shape consensus, leaving the theatre of politics to obscure a predetermined order imposed by financial power.

In 2024, the U.S. military lobby spent about $151 million, spreading its influence across both parties. Defence contractors and their PACs donated approximately $43.5 million directly to candidates, with Democrats receiving roughly $19 million and Republicans $22.4 million. Lockheed Martin’s PAC split its funds 42% to Democrats and 58% to Republicans, while Raytheon gave 46% to Democrats and 54% to Republicans. This bipartisan distribution ensured industry priorities would be safeguarded regardless of electoral outcomes, a clear example of Impartial Capturing.

Impartial Capturing by DemocracySold September 3, 2025