An Erroraticus Insanus is a category of argument so fundamentally flawed that it transcends ordinary logical fallacies and enters the realm of sheer intellectual chaos. It is marked by:
Blatant self-contradiction
Complete detachment from reality
Astonishing overconfidence despite its incoherence
Blatant self-contradiction
Complete detachment from reality
Astonishing overconfidence despite its incoherence
His theory that taxes are actually invisible dragons hoarding our money isn’t just wrong—it’s a full-blown Erroraticus Insanus. Arguing with it would be like wrestling a hallucination.
by sarlinger June 18, 2025
An Erroraticus Insanus is a category of argument so fundamentally flawed that it transcends ordinary logical fallacies and enters the realm of sheer intellectual chaos. It is marked by:
Blatant self-contradiction
Complete detachment from reality
Astonishing overconfidence despite its incoherence
Blatant self-contradiction
Complete detachment from reality
Astonishing overconfidence despite its incoherence
His theory that taxes are actually invisible dragons hoarding our money isn’t just wrong—it’s a full-blown Erroraticus Insanus. Arguing with it would be like wrestling a hallucination.
by sarlinger June 18, 2025
An Erroraticus Insanus is a category of argument so fundamentally flawed that it transcends ordinary logical fallacies and enters the realm of sheer intellectual chaos. It is marked by:
Blatant self-contradiction
Complete detachment from reality
Astonishing overconfidence despite its incoherence
Blatant self-contradiction
Complete detachment from reality
Astonishing overconfidence despite its incoherence
His theory that taxes are actually invisible dragons hoarding our money isn’t just wrong—it’s a full-blown Erroraticus Insanus. Arguing with it would be like wrestling a hallucination
by sarlinger June 18, 2025