Femsexual is a sub-category of pansexuality. It is similar to pansexuality in all aspects, only you are attracted to those of the feminine and occasionally androgynous gender in contrast to being attracted to all genders.
For instance, you can be attracted to all races, sexes, body types, eye colors, etc. so long as they are feminine or androgynous.
Attraction to those of the androgynous gender doesn't happen often unless said androgynous person is more so feminine than masculine.
"Yeah, I'm femsexual. Sort of like pensexual, but exclusively to feminine dudes and chicks."
Femsexuality is a branching Sexuality, from Pansexuality, in the sense that there is no gender preference nor any care for gender, whatsoever, which excludes it from being considered Bisexuality.
However, it is not the same as Pansexuality since it is an attraction specifically towards feminine qualities. These qualities can depend on what a Femsexual believe defines femininity, such as facial/body proportions or aspects, vocal tone, behavior, etc.
"Because I only like girls and guys who are feminine, I identify with Femsexuality."
A meaningless, unimpressive, self-serving introduction. An indicator that the story about to be shared will be pointless and dumb.
Back when I lived in upstate new york, I also had to park on the street - on two occasions, we got enough snow, mixed with just the right plowing, that my car was lifted off the ground from so much snow being jammed underneath it.
Sister: This meeting was to discuss the rough draft of my essay, where we discussed the subsidiary questions I added in my rough draft. We also discussed the relationship between my main title and the real-life situations I chose to use in my essay. We discussed the structure of my essay as well, specifically the Math AOK section and how it relates to the contradiction of the title. This second meeting was particularly helpful in discussing the implications of my essay claims and how to apply the title across various areas of knowledge. There were many sections of the essay that could have been cut down in wordiness and the ways of knowing required further and more in-depth analysis.