When you accuse someone of suffering from the Dunning–Kruger effect in an online argument. You are committing a classic
ad-hominem: You attack the person, claiming they lack intelligence to have a
valid opinion. The argument itself is left untouched.
It is substituting rational thinking with quick emotion-
based judgmental attitudes. Because it feels
better attacking your opponent rather then engaging in clear rational thinking. You're just projecting your own insecurities onto your opponent.
Often goes hand-in-hand with credentialism.
Many zoomers are guilty of using this term in online arguments thinking they're very "
smart" for referencing it. They learned about it from watching YouTube videos. It is very frustrating to deal with them having that mindset.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is about skill competence rather than intelligence.
“You’re a classic example of the Dunning–Kruger effect.”
If you are guilty of using Dunning-Kruger effect in online arguments, please
stop & change your behavior. You're not contributing to
anything positive to foster rational thinking.
If you are not guilty, then continue with what you're doing & don't make yourself susceptible to that behavior. Thank you for not being an
asshole, make sure to avoid people that engage in that behavior.