When one posts a status update on a social networking site and immediately regrets it, but cannot delete it since it's already been posted for all to see, and any revision would be obvious and painfully transparent.
"Aww, man, I'm having some status remorse. I posted that I'm going to Vegas but my supervisor thinks I'm sick. He's probably already seen my status."
by swingladyA September 13, 2009
Get the status remorse mug.Bob wants Jill to like his status. Bob knows Jill likes Aerosmith. Bob makes status "Dream On." Jill takes the "status bait" and likes it.
by kWMp April 20, 2010
Get the status bait mug.Related Words
Commenting on someone's Facebook status with something that has nothing to do with the status. This includes starting conversations with other commenters and annoying everyone else on the string.
by Keifer411 December 21, 2012
Get the Status Bomb mug.An Object that shows off your wealth. Could be a car, house, a boat, jewelry. Status symbols change over the centuries.
by Atotheic February 2, 2008
Get the STATUS SYMBOL mug.The act of hijacking someone's Facebook status through posting a massive amount of random comments in a conversational format.
This requires at least two people, as solo Status Bombing just makes you look like a dick.
Status Bombing should not resemble 'spam' in any way. Comments should range from intelligent debates to deep philosophical exchanges. The more subjects you can encompass with a single bomb, the more glorious it is.
Bombs may include made up statistics and data, and all grammar and punctuation must be correct.
This requires at least two people, as solo Status Bombing just makes you look like a dick.
Status Bombing should not resemble 'spam' in any way. Comments should range from intelligent debates to deep philosophical exchanges. The more subjects you can encompass with a single bomb, the more glorious it is.
Bombs may include made up statistics and data, and all grammar and punctuation must be correct.
Example of a recent Status Bombing
Victim: "i wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges..?"
Bomber #1: "3.52 cm"
Victim: "oh ok thanx."
Bomber #1: "No problem."
Accidental enabler: "would there be less 'ocean' if there were no jelly fish??"
Victim: "ummm, dont get it?"
Bomber #1: "No, but the water level would be a bit lower."
Bomber #2: "You have to compensate for all the fish that those jellyfish would have killed, so removing the jellyfish might make the ocean levels rise slightly."
(Now it's on)
Bomber #1: "If you want to get technical, you must consider the socio-economic ramifications of pirates on shipping vessels off the Somali coast, and their proportional fish vs. jellyfish impact ratio."
Bomber #2: "Since part of the reason for the uprising of the Somali pirates is due to the overfishing of foreign vessels off their coast, it could be said that, since the pirate vessels are quite small in comparison to that of the foreign fishing boats, an increase in pirate activity would lead to a small increase in ocean levels."
Bomber #1: "It goes deeper, though. The decrease in available fishing water for Chinese fishing vessels (the most prolific) has lead to increased fishing and production in the yellow sea. This, in turn, has led to vast environmental changes, sparking mass spawning of giant Nomura's jellyfish (surveys suggest many billions of the 220kb behemoths). This by far outweighs any fish volume related water increase. All the fish in the Yellow Sea are being eaten, leading to a small decrease in water levels. However, this is outweighed by the aforementioned increase in jellyfish, thus leading to a large increase in global water levels.
Bomber #1: "Besides, it's impossible to 'get rid' of jellyfish anyway, killing or netting them causes them to release millions of self-inseminating eggs."
Bomber #2: "Why not just put sterilizers in the water that only affect the aforementioned cnidarian? Or perhaps one which affects both jellyfish and people? Over the long term, it would cause a rapid decrease in China's population, thus reducing the need to fish in the first place (and thus reducing their carbon emissions, allowing the planet to recover slightly)."
Victim: "AAAA SHUT UP!!"
Bombers to each other: "Status Bombing kicks ass."
Victim: "i wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges..?"
Bomber #1: "3.52 cm"
Victim: "oh ok thanx."
Bomber #1: "No problem."
Accidental enabler: "would there be less 'ocean' if there were no jelly fish??"
Victim: "ummm, dont get it?"
Bomber #1: "No, but the water level would be a bit lower."
Bomber #2: "You have to compensate for all the fish that those jellyfish would have killed, so removing the jellyfish might make the ocean levels rise slightly."
(Now it's on)
Bomber #1: "If you want to get technical, you must consider the socio-economic ramifications of pirates on shipping vessels off the Somali coast, and their proportional fish vs. jellyfish impact ratio."
Bomber #2: "Since part of the reason for the uprising of the Somali pirates is due to the overfishing of foreign vessels off their coast, it could be said that, since the pirate vessels are quite small in comparison to that of the foreign fishing boats, an increase in pirate activity would lead to a small increase in ocean levels."
Bomber #1: "It goes deeper, though. The decrease in available fishing water for Chinese fishing vessels (the most prolific) has lead to increased fishing and production in the yellow sea. This, in turn, has led to vast environmental changes, sparking mass spawning of giant Nomura's jellyfish (surveys suggest many billions of the 220kb behemoths). This by far outweighs any fish volume related water increase. All the fish in the Yellow Sea are being eaten, leading to a small decrease in water levels. However, this is outweighed by the aforementioned increase in jellyfish, thus leading to a large increase in global water levels.
Bomber #1: "Besides, it's impossible to 'get rid' of jellyfish anyway, killing or netting them causes them to release millions of self-inseminating eggs."
Bomber #2: "Why not just put sterilizers in the water that only affect the aforementioned cnidarian? Or perhaps one which affects both jellyfish and people? Over the long term, it would cause a rapid decrease in China's population, thus reducing the need to fish in the first place (and thus reducing their carbon emissions, allowing the planet to recover slightly)."
Victim: "AAAA SHUT UP!!"
Bombers to each other: "Status Bombing kicks ass."
by JimbotheBomber May 10, 2009
Get the Status Bombing mug.A status diss is when a person on myspace quickly updates their status after finding out someone that they don't like,a loser or anyone that you wouldn't want to have on your status comments, comments your status
Joe's status:I just saw eclipse it was a pretty cool movie 1:21pm
comments:loser Billy:yEA mAn tHaT mOvIe wAs tOtAlLy KoOl aNd OfF tHe hOoK LmFaO
Joe's status:off to the mall with my girlfriend
1:23pm
loser Billy just got a status diss
comments:loser Billy:yEA mAn tHaT mOvIe wAs tOtAlLy KoOl aNd OfF tHe hOoK LmFaO
Joe's status:off to the mall with my girlfriend
1:23pm
loser Billy just got a status diss
by Status,dissed,faked,my,space, July 11, 2010
Get the Status diss mug.A person who incessantly posts stupid comments in reply to your status updates on social networking sites. This could be as a joke or as something that doesn't make any sense at all. It also could be due to the fact that the comment poster is slightly retarded.
"Did you hear about Steve last night? He bombed Susan's status about her aunt having breast cancer. Asked her if he could be the second opinion."
He's such a status bomber.
He's such a status bomber.
by tstyles77 February 19, 2010
Get the Status Bomber mug.