The reason your youtube video was taken down. 3 seconds of a copyrighted song? Taken down. An edited version of a small clip of a copyrighted video or movie? Taken down.
Nobody likes it.
Nobody likes it.
person 1: my video got copyright striked for 3 seconds of a song
person 2: sometimes copyright is garbage
person 1: yes
person 2: sometimes copyright is garbage
person 1: yes
by axolotldoesstuff_0 February 9, 2022
Get the copyrightmug. 1: The individual right of authors and inventors to exclusively control creations for a time authorized in the 1787 constitution though the term copyright was not used in the Constitution.
2. The statutory ritual or rite said to be authorized by the copyright Act of 1790 to allow purchasing of the right to exclusively choose publishers for a time. This definition was used to subvert the rights of authors in the United States in 1790 but protected the rights of authors in England in 1711.
3. The fundamental right to control creations recognized in Roe v Wade will be first recognized in the United States in Neeley v FCC, et al, (5:12-cv-5074).
2. The statutory ritual or rite said to be authorized by the copyright Act of 1790 to allow purchasing of the right to exclusively choose publishers for a time. This definition was used to subvert the rights of authors in the United States in 1790 but protected the rights of authors in England in 1711.
3. The fundamental right to control creations recognized in Roe v Wade will be first recognized in the United States in Neeley v FCC, et al, (5:12-cv-5074).
1. Copyright was a new term used in print in 1711 in England that was not used in the 1787 Constitution though corporate sponsorship was regulated soon thereafter by the Copyright Act of 1790.
2. Copies of artwork are not allowed in violation of the rules established in the ritual that approximates a right. e.g. copyrite
3. The right to create copies of creation without harming another's rights will finally become copyright instead of copyrite.
2. Copies of artwork are not allowed in violation of the rules established in the ritual that approximates a right. e.g. copyrite
3. The right to create copies of creation without harming another's rights will finally become copyright instead of copyrite.
by CN Foundation August 19, 2012
Get the copyrightmug. by PhoneGuyYT April 22, 2025
Get the three copyright strikesmug. Copyright is a system which protects a persons official work.
When someone copies, reproduces, or does anything to a protected work that recreates any original work in it, they are going against the rules of copyright. The original creator of that piece of work can sue the person who broke the rule against his work.
Remember that copyright does not protect even official work forever. When it is no longer protected by copyright, it becomes part of the public domain. This means people can now copy this piece of work.
You can get permission from the owner to copy the piece of work, and if he/she says yes, you can copy their work without any trouble.
Another thing you should know about copyright is "fair use." Fair use is a rule in which works can be used for purposes, like education, parodies, and more.
Other Fact:
There is even a symbol for copyright. (©)
When someone copies, reproduces, or does anything to a protected work that recreates any original work in it, they are going against the rules of copyright. The original creator of that piece of work can sue the person who broke the rule against his work.
Remember that copyright does not protect even official work forever. When it is no longer protected by copyright, it becomes part of the public domain. This means people can now copy this piece of work.
You can get permission from the owner to copy the piece of work, and if he/she says yes, you can copy their work without any trouble.
Another thing you should know about copyright is "fair use." Fair use is a rule in which works can be used for purposes, like education, parodies, and more.
Other Fact:
There is even a symbol for copyright. (©)
*makes image of anime*
*her image pops up on some website*
"Hey, they didn't remember about my copyright!"
*her image pops up on some website*
"Hey, they didn't remember about my copyright!"
by cxr4 October 9, 2019
Get the Copyrightmug. Hym "This is the equivalent of a piece of paper. Or writing it on a two-way mirror. If I write something on a two way mirror the guy on the other side of the glass just gets to steal it? And why would I not murder kids over that? Sounds like a copyright to me. Setting up the site as though it were a two-mirror explicitly so you can launder and profiteer? How is that not exactly what is happening here?"
by Hym Iam January 26, 2025
Get the Copyrightmug. "Where (YouTube) merely assists an author in the creative process, its use does not change the copyrightability of the output,"
"Where a human inputs their own copyrightable work and that work is perceptible in the output, they will be the author of at least that portion of the output,"
From an "Ars Technica" article about the copyrightability of art as it relates to AI but I think it applies nicely here.
"Where a human inputs their own copyrightable work and that work is perceptible in the output, they will be the author of at least that portion of the output,"
From an "Ars Technica" article about the copyrightability of art as it relates to AI but I think it applies nicely here.
Hym "And what part of 'Using the existing architecture of narrative-interpreting AI in conjunction with a massive data set and a sophisticated compression algorithm (specifically to cut down on the energy cost)' is imperceptible? That's me. That is the 'they will be the author of AT LEAST that portion of the output. THAT is all that is happening here. The YouTube panhandlers wanted to get me for copyright infringement BUT THEY COULDN'T ESTABLISH INTENT. So they decided to engage in this retaliatory and deliberate and for profit copyright infringement campaign. For the YouTube freaks, the retaliatory nature of the act IS the expression of intent. It's cut and dry. It's no intent vs intent. Full forfeiture and restitution! They are also doing it for ideological reason which is a violation of my first amendment rights! Make the jew news pay for burying the story!"
by Hym Iam January 31, 2025
Get the Copyrightmug. A state of being caused by the digitisation of society. Basically, nobody knows when they may use online images and videos. So they use it. And get sued. Cue chaos.
by Typist Type November 6, 2018
Get the Copyright Confusionmug.