“How about some Netflix and chill over at my place?”
“I was kinda hoping for some Disney Plus and Discuss first, sry. I’m not into hookups”
“I was kinda hoping for some Disney Plus and Discuss first, sry. I’m not into hookups”
by Nahiaintgonna November 8, 2019

A person entering a, usually controversial, discussion with the most surface-level, stereotype-based, and hyperbolic arguments possible. Their take then becomes the easy go-to meme response that spreads, resulting in a form of Flanderization for the discussion as a whole, cutting any nuance or complexity to the discourse and adding undeserved importance to it.
Some of the more prevalent examples of this are in discussions of Fermi's paradox, where the go to is, "Aliens don't talk to us because we're stupid," despite how much it's implying about the aliens in question. And arguments about America not using the metric system, with the reason often being, "Americans are too stupid and lazy to understand it," forcing a stereotype and ignoring any actual reasons the US hasn't switched over.
Since these arguments are often done for quick validation, they often have little to no research backing them either due to overconfidence of being right, or an unconscious fear of having to think complexly.
Some of the more prevalent examples of this are in discussions of Fermi's paradox, where the go to is, "Aliens don't talk to us because we're stupid," despite how much it's implying about the aliens in question. And arguments about America not using the metric system, with the reason often being, "Americans are too stupid and lazy to understand it," forcing a stereotype and ignoring any actual reasons the US hasn't switched over.
Since these arguments are often done for quick validation, they often have little to no research backing them either due to overconfidence of being right, or an unconscious fear of having to think complexly.
commenter 1: omfg why don't Americans just switch to metric already, why are they too dumb to do government.
commenter 2: You could leave and google how states' rights work, fucking discussion pollution.
commenter 2: You could leave and google how states' rights work, fucking discussion pollution.
by dirtwashere April 9, 2023

This is what occurs during practice when everyone but your section is outside and you've exhausted every ounce of motivation to practice in you. Does not actually include drunken members, or alcohol for that matter.
*Everyone else but section leaves*
Mike: Okay, let's practice!
*five minutes later*
Mike: Okay, time for a drunken discussion!
Everyone else: It's about time!
Mike: Okay, let's practice!
*five minutes later*
Mike: Okay, time for a drunken discussion!
Everyone else: It's about time!
by Bea Minor July 28, 2017

by mimiyoya<3 March 5, 2022

A chatroom for Pro Anorexia discussion, but the admin is non-existent and the mods are TERRIBLE! A wasteland of a place.
Hey! Have you seen Blah (mod) on Pro-Ana Support and Discussion Chatzy recently?
You mean the 40 year old pervert who preys on young, thin girls? Nope! He’s probably busy drinking. Only ED he has is erectile dysfunction.
You mean the 40 year old pervert who preys on young, thin girls? Nope! He’s probably busy drinking. Only ED he has is erectile dysfunction.
by -winter-girl- April 8, 2024

by mimiyoya<3 March 5, 2022

A double negative which -makes it by earth math standards- a positive verb.
Dis-; having a negative or reversing force | cuss; to swear at, curse.
I.e. double pun.
Dis-; having a negative or reversing force | cuss; to swear at, curse.
I.e. double pun.
by retromouse May 22, 2018
