The term "UFC Purist" is used to describe a noob Mixed Martial Arts fan who only watches and keeps up with MMA fights/fighters within the UFC. Most UFC Purists actually believe that UFC is a sport. Alot of them have been proven to not even know what MMA is. These kind of noobs idolize fighters such as Chuck Liddell, Tito Ortiz, Randy Couture, Matt Hughes, Brock Lesnar, Blow Job Penn etc. UFC Purists can be found anywhere in the Youtube website leaving STUPID, USELESS, POINTLESS, AND UNEDUCATED comments on MMA videos.
If you believe Brock Lesnar would ever beat Fedor Emelianenko, you are a UFC Purist.
If you thought Shogun was gonna lose to Chuck Liddell before their fight you my friend are a UFC Purist.
If someone mentions PRIDE and/or PRIDE fighters and you have no clue what they're talking about, you guessed it! UFC Purist.
If you thought Shogun was gonna lose to Chuck Liddell before their fight you my friend are a UFC Purist.
If someone mentions PRIDE and/or PRIDE fighters and you have no clue what they're talking about, you guessed it! UFC Purist.
by KENPO909 July 18, 2009
Get the UFC Purist mug.Every definition on Urban Dictionary was written by a user like you. About a thousand definitions are sent to Urban Dictionary every day, but only half enter the hallowed ranks beside ratchet, Harlem Shake, and Cleveland Steamer. People often email and ask, why didn’t my definition get published? Well, we’d like to know too.
The truth is, we don’t decide. Sometimes we’re just as puzzled. Some rejected definitions seem perfectly good to us. Sometimes we wouldn’t vote for a definition, but we can’t really say why. Urban Dictionary’s users get to edit the content, so they get to decide. However, since this is a frequent question, we thought we’d look into how users make the decision to publish or not publish a particular definition.
We wanted to understand what matters in a definition, what helps it get accepted. To do this, we started by asking users to just describe a list of eight random submissions. We gave people one line of text to describe the submission. For example, one of the words was “phil collins.”
The truth is, we don’t decide. Sometimes we’re just as puzzled. Some rejected definitions seem perfectly good to us. Sometimes we wouldn’t vote for a definition, but we can’t really say why. Urban Dictionary’s users get to edit the content, so they get to decide. However, since this is a frequent question, we thought we’d look into how users make the decision to publish or not publish a particular definition.
We wanted to understand what matters in a definition, what helps it get accepted. To do this, we started by asking users to just describe a list of eight random submissions. We gave people one line of text to describe the submission. For example, one of the words was “phil collins.”
Not Published
People described this definition as “Somewhat biased”, “opinionated”, or “NO! PHIL COLLINS IS THE SHIT”. We collected 69 responses for each word, grouped them together and tried to find the main idea in the description. We continued to group things together until we ended up with eight categories.
funny
hilarious
pun/play on words
amusing
clever/smart
clearly and correctly written
complicated/too long
bad grammar
capitalized/formatting
confused
specificity
personal
too specific
about a celebrity
slander
biased
opinionated
offensive
degrading
slander
sexist
racist
usage
redundant
original
makes sense
helpful
lame
strange
weird
quality of the definition
informative
true
wrong
accurate
stupid/dumb
graphic
disgusting
visceral
dirty
provocative
sexual
improper
People described this definition as “Somewhat biased”, “opinionated”, or “NO! PHIL COLLINS IS THE SHIT”. We collected 69 responses for each word, grouped them together and tried to find the main idea in the description. We continued to group things together until we ended up with eight categories.
funny
hilarious
pun/play on words
amusing
clever/smart
clearly and correctly written
complicated/too long
bad grammar
capitalized/formatting
confused
specificity
personal
too specific
about a celebrity
slander
biased
opinionated
offensive
degrading
slander
sexist
racist
usage
redundant
original
makes sense
helpful
lame
strange
weird
quality of the definition
informative
true
wrong
accurate
stupid/dumb
graphic
disgusting
visceral
dirty
provocative
sexual
improper
by gpetriz March 29, 2017
Get the Not Published mug.Related Words
Pubris
• purist
• published
• pubis
• Purista
• PUBISAURUSREX
• publish
• Publisher
• publishit
• "published"
An email that is commonly taken personally by people when their definition on Urban Dictionary is not published. It goes like:
Thanks for your definition of ________!
A few volunteer editors read your definition and decided to not publish it. Don't take it personally!
To understand what definitions we publish and reject, check out this blog post: (definitions can't contain links)
Try rewriting your definition so that it's easier for others to understand, then try again.
Thanks,
Urban Dictionary
Then follows the rejected definition.
Thanks for your definition of ________!
A few volunteer editors read your definition and decided to not publish it. Don't take it personally!
To understand what definitions we publish and reject, check out this blog post: (definitions can't contain links)
Try rewriting your definition so that it's easier for others to understand, then try again.
Thanks,
Urban Dictionary
Then follows the rejected definition.
Mark: Mate, my definition on Urban Dictionary was not published
Josiah: Those savage volunteer editors.
Josiah: Those savage volunteer editors.
by Grounds keeper Niel March 31, 2019
Get the not published mug.A person who simply believes only in Japanese animation that has been subtitled. In some cases, they like Japanese games
by Sneeze042 May 24, 2004
Get the anime purist mug.How Japanese people pronounce the english word "please".
Take in consideration that Japan has, like all other countries, different accents.
Take in consideration that Japan has, like all other countries, different accents.
by Veivorok November 30, 2011
Get the Purisu mug.by Jacques Asse April 22, 2009
Get the publisting mug.Publishing houses that rob their star authors to pay bonuses to their oft-underpaid and overworked editors and their bosses, using all kinds of creative strategies to avoid getting caught, while family-owned publishers would notoriously overpay themselves and their loved ones or relatives first, but underpay their employees.
Even in low-corruption Singapore, it’s an open secret that Robinhood publishers continue to thrive, because most authors who’ve a sixth sense of being shortchanged couldn’t afford the legal means to suing them for their decades-long shady business practices.
by Fasters October 21, 2022
Get the Robinhood Publishers mug.