The ratio of upvotes awarded to a commenter compared to upvotes awarded to an original poster (OP) weighted for each user's follower count. TAR adjusts for engagement for both parties. True Adjusted Ratio is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ), where a value >1 is considered a "W"
Strengths:
- TAR reflects the true impact of a comment in unbalanced interactions. Comments with fewer followers are augmented, further amplifying OP's humiliation.
- It is possible for a commenter with fewer followers than OP to have fewer upvotes than OP and still obtain a "W".
Limitations:
- True Adjusted Ratio assumes followers of each account are supportive. It does not take into account "hate-followers".
- TAR fails to take virality into account. A comment is more likely to receive engagement during the time when a post is most viral, after which engagement in both original post and comment deteriorate at different geometric rates.
- TAR calculation does not account for downvotes or tertiary responses. While TAR is a more accurate measure in social media spaces with upvote-only rating systems (e.g. Twitter), ratio calculations may be redundant in spaces which use an upvote/downvote system (e.g. Reddit). Tertiary reactions that are ambiguous (e.g. Facebook) are not factored into this calculation.
- "Premium account" algorithms (such as Elon Musk's blue-check model on Twitter) artificially alter views, skewing engagement in favor of paid subscribers.
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ), where a value >1 is considered a "W"
Strengths:
- TAR reflects the true impact of a comment in unbalanced interactions. Comments with fewer followers are augmented, further amplifying OP's humiliation.
- It is possible for a commenter with fewer followers than OP to have fewer upvotes than OP and still obtain a "W".
Limitations:
- True Adjusted Ratio assumes followers of each account are supportive. It does not take into account "hate-followers".
- TAR fails to take virality into account. A comment is more likely to receive engagement during the time when a post is most viral, after which engagement in both original post and comment deteriorate at different geometric rates.
- TAR calculation does not account for downvotes or tertiary responses. While TAR is a more accurate measure in social media spaces with upvote-only rating systems (e.g. Twitter), ratio calculations may be redundant in spaces which use an upvote/downvote system (e.g. Reddit). Tertiary reactions that are ambiguous (e.g. Facebook) are not factored into this calculation.
- "Premium account" algorithms (such as Elon Musk's blue-check model on Twitter) artificially alter views, skewing engagement in favor of paid subscribers.
True Adjusted Ratio: TAR
OP: Original Post
Folₒₚ: Followers of OP
UVₒₚ: Upvotes for OP
Fol꜀: Followers of commenter
UV꜀: Upvotes for commenter
If a user with 100 followers (Folₒₚ = 100) receives 40 upvotes (UVₒₚ = 40) and a comment from a user with 1000 followers (Fol꜀ = 1000) receives 50 upvotes (UV꜀ = 50), traditional calculation would consider OP "ratioed" using traditional calculation:
R = UV꜀/UVₒₚ = 50/40 = 1.25
R > 1, thus OP would be ratioed
However, since OP's follower count is 1/10th that of the commenter's, the True Adjusted Ratio (TAR) is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ) = 100 / 1000 x 50 / 40 = 0.1 x 1.25 = 0.125,
TAR < 1, thus OP would not be ratioed.
OP: Original Post
Folₒₚ: Followers of OP
UVₒₚ: Upvotes for OP
Fol꜀: Followers of commenter
UV꜀: Upvotes for commenter
If a user with 100 followers (Folₒₚ = 100) receives 40 upvotes (UVₒₚ = 40) and a comment from a user with 1000 followers (Fol꜀ = 1000) receives 50 upvotes (UV꜀ = 50), traditional calculation would consider OP "ratioed" using traditional calculation:
R = UV꜀/UVₒₚ = 50/40 = 1.25
R > 1, thus OP would be ratioed
However, since OP's follower count is 1/10th that of the commenter's, the True Adjusted Ratio (TAR) is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ) = 100 / 1000 x 50 / 40 = 0.1 x 1.25 = 0.125,
TAR < 1, thus OP would not be ratioed.
by SlimerAndTheRealGhostbusters June 26, 2023
Get the True Adjusted Ratio mug.a phrase indicating a very high often anatomically inaccurate hip-to-waist ratio, typically associated with femboy furry art.
the name comes from matching the ratio of twitter reply likes to the original post’s likes where the former “ratioes” the latter
the name comes from matching the ratio of twitter reply likes to the original post’s likes where the former “ratioes” the latter
some guy on twitter: posts an art of a femboy furry with a ridiculously thin waist
the comments: mfing twitter hip ratio, where are their organs
the comments: mfing twitter hip ratio, where are their organs
by Red Penguin June 17, 2024
Get the twitter hip ratio mug.When your support role is doing more damage then its supposed to do compared its healing . The damage doesn't have to be higher then the healing but just high enough so that you notice. This behavior stems from the individual misunderstanding or lack of desire to play the role accordingly.
Person A: I'm not getting any healing!
Person B: Of course not bro, our support has 4k damage and only 200 heal.
Person A: He's got a fucking Zilber Ratio.
Person B: Of course not bro, our support has 4k damage and only 200 heal.
Person A: He's got a fucking Zilber Ratio.
by Dan mayor June 28, 2024
Get the Zilber Ratio mug.When a someone posts something thinking it’s based, when it is infact widely accepted, non-controversial, and has no one arguing in the comments.
High like low comment ratio, implies that the poster may possibly not be a human but instead is infact an automated bot account, or a human with NPC like tendencies which can fool people into presuming it’s a bot.
This usually requires highly tribalistic & partisan behavior. Meaning there may not be anything critical or based with that account’s other posts. This is specially true if that account has repeated occurrences.
There is a direct correlation between posting controversial matter and getting many comments.
High like low comment ratio, implies that the poster may possibly not be a human but instead is infact an automated bot account, or a human with NPC like tendencies which can fool people into presuming it’s a bot.
This usually requires highly tribalistic & partisan behavior. Meaning there may not be anything critical or based with that account’s other posts. This is specially true if that account has repeated occurrences.
There is a direct correlation between posting controversial matter and getting many comments.
by kakapoopooaccount July 14, 2024
Get the High like, low comment ratio mug.A: "ISN'T DR RATIO SO HOT I WANT HIM TO SHOVE HIS DICK IN MY ASS"
B: "Are you mentally ok? Anyways, same."
B: "Are you mentally ok? Anyways, same."
by Frannie (zhongli lover) August 5, 2024
Get the dr ratio mug.The quantitative measure expressing the relationship between the volume of water in a specific environment and the number of human bodies or remnants thereof present within that same locale. This ratio is typically invoked to assess the psychological acceptability or aversion to swimming or engaging in recreational activities in bodies of water where human remains are known or presumed to be present.
A conceptual metric used to gauge the threshold at which human presence, in the form of living individuals or deceased bodies, in a water body shifts from being imperceptible or negligible to becoming a significant factor influencing human behavior, particularly in the context of recreational water activities.
A conceptual metric used to gauge the threshold at which human presence, in the form of living individuals or deceased bodies, in a water body shifts from being imperceptible or negligible to becoming a significant factor influencing human behavior, particularly in the context of recreational water activities.
If you think about the aquacorporeal ratio, you'd probably be okay swimming in the ocean even though there are shipwrecks and stuff, but a single body in a pool would totally freak you out.
by noahsarklabel April 1, 2024
Get the Aquacorporeal Ratio mug.When selecting a prostitute, the optimal rental criteria is finding the fattest and oldest hoe with the most skin for your dollar, to maximize your investment's worth in the night.
SI Unit is meter squared per USD
SI Unit is meter squared per USD
Man, Jimmy is such an idiot! He picked the skinny twenty year old hooker when he had a chance to pick up that Granny Gorlock at the end of the street! He didn't pay attention to the Skin to Buck Ratio (SBR).
by seriousspam April 16, 2024
Get the Skin to Buck Ratio (SBR) mug.