Virginia Apgar + Victor Varnado + Bruce Willis (A Mathematical Song))

What I call homo-sapiens who are addicted to abscesses?

Person 1: Are you addicted to abscesses?
Person 2: Yes.
Person 1: Virginia Apgar + Victor Varnado + Bruce Willis (A Mathematical Song))

by LeSouffleDeVersailles January 21, 2025

Courtesy of Vics

When you see those Hartford boys out and about looking all steezy and dripped up to the brim you say “shi that must be courtesy of vics”

Lincon: “Yo did you see those Hartford kids that must be courtesy of vics”

by Cannotbenamed February 24, 2025

Dickie Licky Vickie

Dickie Licky Vickie

Dickie Licky Vickie

by SuelTameOresuTeMato April 25, 2025

Dickie Licky Vickie; The Dandelion Deed Through The Crevices Of An Elephant, WHom Is Actually A Komodo Dragon <Monitor`~`Lizard>

Dickie Licky Vickie; The Dandelion Deed Through The Crevices Of An Elephant, WHom Is Actually A Komodo Dragon <Monitor`~`Lizard>

Dickie Licky Vickie; The Dandelion Deed Through The Crevices Of An Elephant, WHom Is Actually A Komodo Dragon <Monitor`~`Lizard>

by SuelTameOresuTeMato April 25, 2025

Justification against Victims of Capitalism

The direct argument that the harms suffered under capitalist systems—poverty, alienation, exploitation—are necessary, deserved, or noble. It frames victims as willing participants in a fair game (“they chose that job”), as beneficiaries of growth (“a rising tide lifts all boats”), or as unfortunate but acceptable casualties of progress and efficiency.

Justification against Victims of Capitalism Example: A politician arguing against a living wage by stating, “Low wages are what give young people the hunger to climb the ladder. Struggle builds character.” This justification against victims of capitalism transmutes systemic economic coercion into a moral virtue, suggesting that being underpaid is a beneficial rite of passage rather than exploitation.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Rationalization against Victims of Capitalism

The cognitive process of using abstract economic principles to explain away suffering, making it seem like an inevitable outcome of natural laws rather than political choices. It involves appeals to “market logic,” “incentive structures,” or “competitiveness” to drain moral outrage from scenes of human devastation.

Rationalization against Victims of Capitalism Example: An economist on TV discussing factory closures: “While painful for communities, the relocation of manufacturing overseas is a rational allocation of global capital and labor. It’s simply how efficient markets work.” This rationalization uses the clinical language of efficiency to neutralize the tragedy of deindustrialization.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Logicalization against the Victims of Capitalism

The application of formal, pseudo-logical deductions to prove that victims of capitalism are either non-existent or at fault. It constructs syllogisms from debatable premises (“Markets are free,” “People are rational actors”) to “prove” that outcomes are always fair, and that therefore any victim must be illogical or lazy.

Logicalization against the Victims of Capitalism Example: “Premise 1: The market pays you what you’re worth. Premise 2: You are poor. Conclusion: Therefore, you are of low worth. QED.” This logicalization uses the veneer of airtight reason to transform a structural condition (poverty) into a personal, logical judgment, dismissing appeals to unfairness as emotional error.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026