From observation, recognising that the general standard of television in my opinion has deteriorated and continues to do so year by year, so much so I now watch very little, I’ve found as far as the programme quality and content on all television channels, the following Doghouse's Laws of Television often apply.
I started compiling this list several years ago and some of these "laws" are now occasionally mentioned by contributors to a specific TV network message board, though of course they can apply to any channel.
I'm sure other contributors may relate to some of them and can think of other examples of practices which could be added to the list.
With a new programme, if your impression of it after ten minutes is that it's going to be rubbish, you’ll only be right 95% of the time.
The number of advance programme trails screened, will be in inverse proportion to the quality of the programme. The ”best bits” of any programme will be included in the trail.
The volume of background music will often be in inverse proportion to the amount of watchable activity on the screen at that time.
Any TV audience gets the standard of programmes it deserves. It’s no good complaining about the quality of a programme if you continue to watch it.
If an idea for a programme suggested to a TV network commissioning department isn’t another soap in one form or another, or requires an "in your face" presenter/auto-cutie, celebrities, judges, phone votes, or the inclusion of dysfunctional members of the public, it is unlikely to be made.
The number of programme presenters appearing at any one time, will usually be in inverse proportion to the quality of the programme.
The number and variety of similar programmes on TV, are likely to be in inverse proportion to their cost to present.
To reach the widest audience, in a programme where the subject is of a specific nature, it may include totally unrelated elements in an attempt to also “engage” viewers who aren’t the slightest bit interested in the actual topic, in a futile attempt to increase the ratings.
Some programmes, even a few news bulletins, given the level at which the programme makers pitch their production, should have the words; "for Dummies" added to the title.
If you've any doubts about watching a programme, from the trails or advertising you've seen, take a chance, give it a miss.
I started compiling this list several years ago and some of these "laws" are now occasionally mentioned by contributors to a specific TV network message board, though of course they can apply to any channel.
I'm sure other contributors may relate to some of them and can think of other examples of practices which could be added to the list.
With a new programme, if your impression of it after ten minutes is that it's going to be rubbish, you’ll only be right 95% of the time.
The number of advance programme trails screened, will be in inverse proportion to the quality of the programme. The ”best bits” of any programme will be included in the trail.
The volume of background music will often be in inverse proportion to the amount of watchable activity on the screen at that time.
Any TV audience gets the standard of programmes it deserves. It’s no good complaining about the quality of a programme if you continue to watch it.
If an idea for a programme suggested to a TV network commissioning department isn’t another soap in one form or another, or requires an "in your face" presenter/auto-cutie, celebrities, judges, phone votes, or the inclusion of dysfunctional members of the public, it is unlikely to be made.
The number of programme presenters appearing at any one time, will usually be in inverse proportion to the quality of the programme.
The number and variety of similar programmes on TV, are likely to be in inverse proportion to their cost to present.
To reach the widest audience, in a programme where the subject is of a specific nature, it may include totally unrelated elements in an attempt to also “engage” viewers who aren’t the slightest bit interested in the actual topic, in a futile attempt to increase the ratings.
Some programmes, even a few news bulletins, given the level at which the programme makers pitch their production, should have the words; "for Dummies" added to the title.
If you've any doubts about watching a programme, from the trails or advertising you've seen, take a chance, give it a miss.
by Doghouse Riley November 2, 2008
Get the Doghouse's Laws of Television mug.by J Dolla August 20, 2007
Get the televisaphonerneting mug.Related Words
by Dr. Brian O'Blivion May 6, 2004
Get the television mug.Lazy parents that are unable to parent their children, due to severe brain damage. They feel that they shouldn't have to parent their children, and when they give their children access to anything they don't want their kids to see, they feel that it is not their own fault for enabling the child to see the questionable content, but the entertainment industry for "corrupting" their "innocent" children's minds. They are also very naive, thinking that because they don't want their kids to see it, nobody should be allowed to. They are typically too busy bathing in their own stupidity, or arguing about something else that "corrupts" their children at a PTA meeting, to actually monitor what their kids do, so they try to force others to do it for them, by stripping the rights of everyone else.
Typical Parents Television Council supporter
"It's not MY job to parent my kids, that's the entertainment industry and the governments job!"
"How dare those evil corporations show something I don't want my kids to watch!"
"What? Did you just say parent your children? That's absurd! Why would I take care of my kids anyways? That's what the TV's for, right?"
"It's not MY job to parent my kids, that's the entertainment industry and the governments job!"
"How dare those evil corporations show something I don't want my kids to watch!"
"What? Did you just say parent your children? That's absurd! Why would I take care of my kids anyways? That's what the TV's for, right?"
by Da Cawtz March 16, 2014
Get the Parents Television Council mug.the broadcasting of a moving picture
by Mr. Dictionary! February 20, 2004
Get the television mug.Television Indecision (TI for short) is the state of indecision about which television to watch while watching a sporting event at a sports bar. This condition tends to flare up when there is a tense or exciting game or fight on.
Guy 1: Man, I don't know which TV to watch, there are so many!
Guy 2: I know man, I can't either. I think I'll watch the huge projector.
Guy 1: But that big plasma screen is so much closer!
Guy 2: Man I hate Television Indecision.
Guy 2: I know man, I can't either. I think I'll watch the huge projector.
Guy 1: But that big plasma screen is so much closer!
Guy 2: Man I hate Television Indecision.
by Chitin_Commando October 25, 2010
Get the Television Indecision mug.My tv doesn't have on/off switch.
by Saints September 24, 2003
Get the television mug.