soul arousal/hornysoul

When you want to be intimate with someone because you want to deepen the spiritual connection with them, not just because you’re physically or psychologically attracted to each other. It’s what makes souls mate.

I finally went on a date with THE guy.
-Omg how is he?!
-We connected on such a deep level, it’s like our spirits have met. I feel like he made my soul horny.
-Ohh, you’ve got a case of soul arousal/hornysoul. How nice for you.

by lowkeytomi May 19, 2025

soul arousal/hornysoul

When you want to be intimate with someone because you want to deepen the spiritual connection with them, not just because you’re physically or psychologically attracted to each other. It’s what makes souls mate.

I finally went on a date with THE guy.
-Omg how is he?!
-We connected on such a deep level, it’s like our spirits have met. I feel like he made my soul horny.
-Ohh, you’ve got a case of soul arousal/hornysoul. How nice for you.

by lowkeytomi May 19, 2025

Soul arousal/hornysoul

When you want to be intimate with someone because you want to deepen the spiritual connection with them, not just because you’re physically or psychologically attracted to each other. It’s what makes souls mate.

I finally went on a date with THE guy.
-Omg how is he?!
-We connected on such a deep level, it’s like our spirits have met. I feel like he made my soul horny.
-Ohh, you’ve got a case of soul arousal/hornysoul. How nice for you.

by lowkeytomi May 19, 2025

Shyly Aroused

When you are sexually aroused but you're shy so you don't feel like speaking your urges

Maya was shyly aroused by Nathan, she wanted the cock but didn't want to tell him

by Lmao27 July 18, 2025

The Publisher or the Accuser

To quote scripture as a critique of those in Power, is not proof that the author is a messiah, including yours truly (i.e this author), nor does it become an indictment of any faith, that those in power purport to have; nor does this profoundly flawed author, have a desire, or delusion of messianic status.

It is still valid to ask who is like the biblical reference of Lucifer, regardless of source: When multiple wars and unspeakable horrors are still raging on today, surely the issue becomes:

Who is causing such? ... to whom should we put the focus on, for these horrors? Those that claim to represent a nation, with horrors carried out, or facilitated, in our name, who do we hold to account?

If we take Judaism, for example, there are profound academic publishers, of the Jewish faith, that speak profound truth to power. The most prominent, namely and arguably, the greatest: Noam Chomsky, & to name others, such as Max Abrahms.

If we take Christianity, for example: Barack Obama claims to be a devout Christian, however he oversaw the rise of the worst, deliberate, mass persecution, and murder, of Iraqi and Syrian Christians, in the Middle East, of modern times. With a total MSM blackout. Facilitated by his western Intelligence, and their arming & support of Jihadi terrorists. Relabelled as moderates by our western MSM.

Not to mention the horrors of other faiths, including the Yazidi Genocide in Sinjar, with Western intelligence complicit, in enabling such horrors.

The Publishing such atrocities is surely important, to us tax payers, when committed or facilitated, in our name. MSM often has blackouts of such horrors; & similarly of western intelligence, with clear atrocities happening into and beyond the Trump administration.

To name a few, under Trump, with evidence on Twitter:

Weeping Syrian Farmers with their vast wheat fields deliberately burnt 🌾 🔥 🌾 🔥 🌾 🔥 🌾 🔥 🌾 down; or explicit US Military 🇺🇸 occupation and theft of Syria’s national 🇸🇾 oil 🔫

But also legacy atrocities continued to this day, such as the UN sanctioned & induced famine 💀 in Yemen 🇾🇪 (In 2016 UN voted to blockade Yemen - only Russia & China abstaining); and surely Guantanamo Bay ⛓

Publishers at times, publish at great risk to themselves, or their reputation. Indeed Julian Assange has had his freedom taken away for publishing a vast sea of human rights violations, while the anonymous Intelligence Agencies manufacture an ocean of consent, with proven false flags, accusations & horrors; without consequence: With Impunity.

So to quote the Lucifer text from the Bible:

Isaiah 14:12 (NKJV)

“How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground, you who weakened the nations!”

Isaiah 14:17 (NKJV)

“That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?”

So, who should be held to account? The Publisher or the Accuser?

by mr_carter_da_honkytonk_player_ February 9, 2021

Conspiracy Theory Accusation Fallacy

The rhetorical move of accusing someone of believing conspiracy theories as a way of dismissing their arguments without engagement. The accusation functions as social exclusion—positioning the target as paranoid, irrational, or dangerous. The fallacy lies in using the accusation itself as the argument, rather than addressing the actual claims. It's ad hominem by category: you don't have to refute someone if you can successfully frame them as a "conspiracy theorist."

Conspiracy Theory Accusation Fallacy "I raised questions about media consolidation and its effects on news coverage. Response: 'Oh, you're one of those conspiracy theorists.' That's Conspiracy Theory Accusation Fallacy—using the label to dismiss, not engaging the substance. Media consolidation is real, documented, and worth discussing. But the accusation short-circuits the conversation before it starts."

by Dumu The Void February 28, 2026

Argumentum Ad Accusationem

A form of Argumentum Ad Te where the focus shifts to accusing the opponent based on their argument rather than dealing with the argument's content. "You're just accusing" becomes a way of dismissing claims without engagement. The move reframes substantive critique as mere accusation, then dismisses the accusation as unworthy of response. It's a meta-dodge: instead of addressing what was said, you address the act of saying it—treating critique as attack, analysis as accusation. The fallacy lies in using the form of the response (it's an accusation) to avoid its content.

"I documented patterns of unfair treatment. Response: 'You're just accusing—that's Argumentum Ad Accusationem.' By calling it accusation, they avoid the documentation. Maybe it's accusation; maybe it's evidence. The label doesn't settle it, but it lets them feel justified in not engaging. Accusation as a magic word that makes critique disappear."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026