Ah, Wikipedia, the crowning jewel of the internet's dissemination of knowledge, or so it proclaims. Here, in this vast expanse of cyberspace, self-proclaimed enlightened geniuses appoint themselves as the gatekeepers of truth. With a flourish of their keyboards, they weave narratives, handpicking sources with the precision of artists selecting their colors, ensuring each one aligns perfectly with their carefully curated perspectives. These chosen facts, plucked from the tree of knowledge with discerning taste, are then presented to the world as irrefutable truths, as if etched into the very fabric of reality by the quill of knowledge itself. Venture forth to challenge these sacred scriptures, and find yourself embarking on a quixotic quest. For to question the gospel according to Wikipedia's elite is to commit digital heresy. Attempt to rectify, to edit, to dare suggest an alternative view, and watch as the guardians of this digital domain descend upon you. With a few swift keystrokes, they smite your contributions, casting them into the abyss of the internet's forgotten memories.
And should you persist, daring to challenge the sanctity of their so-called facts, a more severe punishment awaits. Your very means of contribution, is excommunicated. Your IP address, now deemed a heretic’s banner, is banished, cast out into the outer darkness of the online world. There, you'll find yourself among the other lost souls who dared to question, to challenge, to think differently.
And should you persist, daring to challenge the sanctity of their so-called facts, a more severe punishment awaits. Your very means of contribution, is excommunicated. Your IP address, now deemed a heretic’s banner, is banished, cast out into the outer darkness of the online world. There, you'll find yourself among the other lost souls who dared to question, to challenge, to think differently.
Thus, Wikipedia stands, a towering ivory tower of self-righteous knowledge, its foundations supported by the echoes of those it has silenced. It remains an untouchable church of information, where only the anointed may preach. Here, in this pantheon of selective truth, the power of knowledge is wielded like a sword, cutting down dissenters and elevating the chosen narratives to the status of holy writ.
by The Banished April 27, 2024
Get the Wikipedia mug.by totally_normal_person February 20, 2023
Get the Wikipedia mug.A game played using wikipedia in which most of the good words from the urban dictionary are entered into wikipedia to see if any of the results will be funny (most of them are)
by Charlie Row October 18, 2008
Get the wikipedia shit mug.A person who contributes to Wikipedia, especially a regular contributor versed in the ways of the site.
by Geek party January 31, 2019
Get the Wikipediaer mug.Ethan, the researcher, was too afraid of researching what a punky brewster is. He pulled a Wikipedia style.
by Burrywood May 10, 2024
Get the Wikipedia Style mug.by Meme Ghost October 6, 2021
Get the wikipedia mug."Wikipedia does not count."
"Wikipedia is not a reliable source."
"Don't even ask if you can use Wikipedia."
"Wikipedia is useful in understanding the basics of a subject."
"Wikipedia is not a reliable source."
"Don't even ask if you can use Wikipedia."
"Wikipedia is useful in understanding the basics of a subject."
by Druff, Dan September 23, 2017
Get the wikipedia mug.